Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,187

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessment of a HER2 scoring system for gastric cancer: results from a validation study

Hofmann, M, Stoss, O, Shi, D, Büttner, R, Van De Vijver, M, Kim, W, Ochiai, A, Rüschoff, J, Henkel, T·2008·Histopathology

Abstract

Aims: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression/amplification is implicated in the development of various solid tumour types. Validated methods and scoring systems for evaluating HER2 status exist in breast cancer, but not in gastric cancer. The aim was to establish a HER2 scoring system for gastric cancer to identify suitable patients for enrolment in a trial of trastuzumab (Herceptin®) in advanced metastatic gastric cancer. Methods and results: Formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded gastric cancer samples were tested for HER2 status using the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) pharmDx™ kit (Dako Denmark A/S). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed using the HercepTest™ (Dako). Concordance between FISH and IHC was 93.5% in 168 evaluable samples. Eleven samples were scored as FISH+ but IHC− or equivocal. Conclusions: IHC/FISH discrepancies were attributed to basolateral membranous immunoreactivity of glandular cells resulting in incomplete membranous reactivity and/or a higher rate of tumour heterogeneity in gastric cancer compared with breast cancer. With modifications to the IHC scoring system, the HercepTest™ is considered valid for the identification of HER2+ gastric tumours for this clinical trial. Correlation of HER2 scores with clinical outcomes will be needed to determine which patients might benefit from trastuzumab therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2008.03028.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 1,187

Metadata

Authors
Hofmann, M., Stoss, O., Shi, D., Büttner, R., Van De Vijver, M., Kim, W., Ochiai, A., Rüschoff, J., & Henkel, T.
Venue
Histopathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-04-18
Volume
52
Issue
7
Pages
797-805
ISSN
  • 0309-0167 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2559
OpenAlex
W1987009448
Cited by
1,187
References
3
FWCI
17.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of a HER2 scoring system for gastric cancer: results from a validation study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2008.03028.x
The paper
Hofmann, M., Stoss, O., Shi, D., Büttner, R., Van De Vijver, M., Kim, W., Ochiai, A., Rüschoff, J., & Henkel, T. (2008). Assessment of a HER2 scoring system for gastric cancer: results from a validation study. Histopathology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2008.03028.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.