The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the deep structure of information systems
Abstract
Abstract. The deep structure of an information system comprises those properties that manifest the meaning of the real‐world system the information system is intended to model. In this paper we describe three models we have developed of information systems' deep‐structure properties. The first, the representational model, proposes a set of constructs that enable the ontological expressiveness of grammars used to model information systems (such as the entity‐relationship model) to be evaluated. The second, the state‐tracking model, proposes four requirements that information systems must satisfy if they are to faithfully track the real‐world system they are intended to model. The third, the good‐decomposition model, proposes three necessary conditions that information systems must meet if they are to be well decomposed. The three models provide a theoretically based, structured way of evaluating grammars that are used to analyse, design and implement information systems and scripts that have been generated using these grammars to describe specific information systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The entity-relationship model—toward a unified view of data
Chen, P. P.-S. (1976) · ACM Transactions on Database Systems · doi:10.1145/320434.320440 · Cited by 4,708
Churchland, P. M., & Churchland, P. S. (1990) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0190-32 · Cited by 363
Cited by
Design Science in Information Systems Research1
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148625 · Cited by 10,707
Design science in information systems research
(2004) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.5555/2017212.2017217 · Cited by 8,254
Anchoring Data Quality Dimensions in Ontological Foundations
Wand, Y., & Wang, R. Y. (1996) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/240455.240479 · Cited by 1,479
Self-citationThe Making of Data Commodities: Data Analytics as an Embedded Process
Aaltonen, A., Alaimo, C., & Kallinikos, J. (2021) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2021.1912928 · Cited by 95
Conceptualizing generative AI as style engines: Application archetypes and implications
Riemer, K., & Peter, S. (2024) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102824 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Wand, Y., & Weber, R.
- Venue
- Information Systems Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 203-223
- ISSN
- 1350-1917 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2575
- OpenAlex
- W1980243955
- Cited by
- 570
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.