Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 355

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sterilization of infected root‐canal dentine by topical application of a mixture of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole and minocycline in situ

SATO, I., ANDO‐KURIHARA, N., KOTA, K., IWAKU, M., HOSHINO, E.·1996·International Endodontic Journal

Abstract

Summary: The aim of this study was to observe the potential of a mixture of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole and minocycline to kill bacteria in the deep layers of root canal dentine in situ. After the crowns of extracted teeth had been removed, the drug combination (0.5 mg of each drug), or sterile saline, as the control, was placed in the root canals which had been previously irrigated ultra‐sonically with 0.4 m EDTA. The penetration and bactericidal efficacy were estimated by various procedures as follows. (1) A cell suspension of E. coli was placed into small cavities prepared parallel to the root canals on the cut planes of nine single‐rooted teeth. The teeth were then entirely covered with blue inlay wax. At time 0, and at 5h, 24h and 48h after the drug combination had been applied, cells of E. coli were recovered from the cavities by washing the cavities several times with sterile saline solution, and were cultured on the surfaces of heart‐infusion (HI) agar plates. Total colony‐forming units were then counted. Bacterial recoveries decreased with time, and no bacteria were recovered 48 h after application of the drug combination, while bacteria survived in all cases with the controls. (2) After the drug combination or sterile saline had been placed into and sealed in the root canal with blue inlay wax, the teeth were placed into HI agar plates where cells of E. coli had been inoculated. After culturing, a clear zone caused by the inhibition of bacterial growth was observed around the teeth, but not in the control experiment. (3) After sampling infected root dentine of 12 freshly extracted teeth as positive controls, the drug combination (0.5 mg each) was placed in the root canals. No bacteria were recovered from the infected dentine of the root canal wall 24 h after application of the drug combination, except in one case in which a few bacteria were recovered. On the basis of these results, penetration through dentine and antibacterial efficacy of the drug combination can be expected against bacteria infecting the dentine of the root canal wall in situ when the drugs were placed in root canals which had been irrigated ultrasonically.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1996.tb01172.x

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 355

Metadata

Authors
SATO, I., ANDO‐KURIHARA, N., KOTA, K., IWAKU, M., & HOSHINO, E.
Venue
International Endodontic Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-03
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
118-124
ISSN
  • 0143-2885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2591
OpenAlex
W2100480078
Cited by
355
References
17
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sterilization of infected root‐canal dentine by topical application of a mixture of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole and minocycline in situ. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1996.tb01172.x
The paper
SATO, I., ANDO‐KURIHARA, N., KOTA, K., IWAKU, M., & HOSHINO, E. (1996). Sterilization of infected root‐canal dentine by topical application of a mixture of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole and minocycline in situ. International Endodontic Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1996.tb01172.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.