Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 231

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Biocompatibility of two commercial forms of mineral trioxide aggregate

Camilleri, J., Montesin, F. E., Papaioannou, S., McDonald, F., Pitt Ford, T. R.·2004·International Endodontic Journal

Abstract

Aim To examine the biocompatibility of two commercial forms of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), by evaluating the morphology of an established cell line. Methodology The two cements were cast on glass cover slips and cured for 1 or 28 days. Saos‐2 osteosarcoma cells were trypsinized and seeded at a density of 1 × 10 5 cells and were then placed in medium over the material‐coated coverslips for 1, 5 and 7 days. After these time intervals the media were discarded and the cells fixed. Cell morphological investigation was performed by scanning electron microscopy at various magnifications ranging from × 250 to× 500. The biocompatibility of cement constituents, alusilicate flux and bismuth oxide was also investigated. Results All cement samples cured for 1 day showed a confluent cell monolayer after 5 and 7 days. The response to both materials was similar. Materials cured for 28 days showed incomplete cell confluence after 1 and 5 days. Alusilicate flux and bismuth oxide did not demonstrate biocompatibility. Conclusions The 1‐day cured samples of two commercial forms of MTA showed good biocompatibility. However, the 28‐day cured samples were less biocompatible after 1 and 5 days.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00859.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 231

Metadata

Authors
Camilleri, J., Montesin, F. E., Papaioannou, S., McDonald, F., & Pitt Ford, T. R.
Venue
International Endodontic Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-09-02
Volume
37
Issue
10
Pages
699-704
ISSN
  • 0143-2885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2591
OpenAlex
W2110851736
Cited by
231
References
0
FWCI
9.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biocompatibility of two commercial forms of mineral trioxide aggregate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00859.x
The paper
Camilleri, J., Montesin, F. E., Papaioannou, S., McDonald, F., & Pitt Ford, T. R. (2004). Biocompatibility of two commercial forms of mineral trioxide aggregate. International Endodontic Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00859.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.