The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literature
Abstract
Ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal can be performed with or without simultaneous ultrasonic instrumentation. When canal shaping is not undertaken the term passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) can be used to describe the technique. In this paper the relevant literature on PUI is reviewed from a MEDLINE database search. Passive ultrasonic irrigation can be performed with a small file or smooth wire (size 10–20) oscillating freely in the root canal to induce powerful acoustic microstreaming. PUI can be an important supplement for cleaning the root canal system and, compared with traditional syringe irrigation, it removes more organic tissue, planktonic bacteria and dentine debris from the root canal. PUI is more efficient in cleaning canals than ultrasonic irrigation with simultaneous ultrasonic instrumentation. PUI can be effective in curved canals and a smooth wire can be as effective as a cutting K‐file. The taper and the diameter of the root canal were found to be important parameters in determining the efficacies of dentine debris removal. Irrigation with sodium hypochlorite is more effective than with water and ultrasonic irrigation is more effective than sonic irrigation in the removal of dentine debris from the root canal. The role of cavitation during PUI remains inconclusive. No detailed information is available on the influence of the irrigation time, the volume of the irrigant, the penetration depth of the instrument and the shape and material properties of the instrument. The influence of irrigation frequency and intensity on the streaming pattern as well as the complicated interaction of acoustic streaming with the adherent biofilm needs to be clarified to reveal the underlying physical mechanisms of PUI.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Present status and future directions – irrigants and irrigation methods
Boutsioukis, C., & Arias‐Moliz, M. T. (2022) · International Endodontic Journal · doi:10.1111/iej.13739 · Cited by 367
Hand and ultrasonic instrumentation for orthograde root canal treatment of permanent teeth
Pedrazzi, V., Oliveira-Neto, J. M., Sequeira, P., Fedorowicz, Z., & Nasser, M. (2008) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006384.pub3 · Cited by 9
Retracted
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Der Sluis, L. W. M., Versluis, M., Wu, M. K., & Wesselink, P. R.
- Venue
- International Endodontic Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-05-09
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 415-426
- ISSN
- 0143-2885 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2591
- OpenAlex
- W2147112341
- Cited by
- 849
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01243.x
- The paper
- Van Der Sluis, L. W. M., Versluis, M., Wu, M. K., & Wesselink, P. R. (2007). Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literature. International Endodontic Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01243.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.