The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pulp revascularization of necrotic bilateral bicuspids using a modified novel technique to eliminate potential coronal discolouration: a case report
Open accessAbstract
Aim To present a case report in which the pulp of two bilateral mandibular premolars with dens evaginatus were revascularized using a modified novel technique to avoid undesired crown discolouration. Summary Recently, regeneration of necrotic pulps has become an alternative conservative treatment option for young permanent teeth with immature roots and is a subject of great interest in the field of endodontics. This novel procedure exploits the full potential of the pulp for dentine deposition and produces a stronger mature root that is better able to withstand the forces than can result in fracture. However, the current protocol has potential clinical and biological complications. Amongst them, crown discolouration, development of resistant bacterial strains and allergic reaction to the intracanal medication. In the case presented, a modified technique to avoid undesired crown discolouration was applied sealing the dentinal tubules of the chamber, thus avoiding any contact between the tri‐antibiotic paste and the dentinal walls. Key learning points • Sealing the dentinal tubules of the chamber prevents the undesirable crown discolouration produced by tri‐antibiotic medication whilst maintaining the revascularization potential of the pulp. • Further research is warranted to seek an alternative infection control protocol capable of preventing possible allergic reactions and development of resistant strains of bacteria, as well as a biological material capable of inducing angiogenesis and allow a more predictable scaffold and tissue regeneration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pulp Revascularization of Immature Dog Teeth With Apical Periodontitis
Thibodeau, B., Teixeira, F., Yamauchi, M., Caplan, D. J., & Trope, M. (2007) · Journal of Endodontics · doi:10.1016/j.joen.2007.03.001 · Cited by 353
Assessment of reliability of electrical and thermal pulp testing agents
Fuss, Z., Trowbridge, H., Bender, I. B., Rickoff, B., & Sorin, S. (1986) · Journal of Endodontics · doi:10.1016/s0099-2399(86)80112-1 · Cited by 215 · cited 1×
“Current vitality tests still depend on neurological stimulation and its reliability on immature teeth is considered questionable (Fulling & Andreasen 1976, Fuss et al. 1986).”
Background
Cited by
Mandras, N., Roana, J., Allizond, V., Pasqualini, D., Crosasso, P., Burlando, M., Banche, G., Denisova, T., Berutti, E., & Cuffini, A. M. (2013) · International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1177/039463201302600232 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Reynolds, K., Johnson, J. D., & Cohenca, N.
- Venue
- International Endodontic Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-12-16
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 84-92
- ISSN
- 0143-2885 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2591
- OpenAlex
- W2111647340
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pulp revascularization of necrotic bilateral bicuspids using a modified novel technique to eliminate potential coronal discolouration: a case report. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01467.x
- The paper
- Reynolds, K., Johnson, J. D., & Cohenca, N. (2009). Pulp revascularization of necrotic bilateral bicuspids using a modified novel technique to eliminate potential coronal discolouration: a case report. International Endodontic Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01467.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.