Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chemical–physical properties of TheraCal, a novel light‐curable MTA‐like material for pulp capping

Gandolfi, M. G., Siboni, F., Prati, C.·2012·International Endodontic Journal

Abstract

Gandolfi MG, Siboni F, Prati C. Chemical–physical properties of TheraCal, a novel light‐curable MTA‐like material for pulp capping. International Endodontic Journal, 45, 571–579, 2012. Aim To evaluate the chemical–physical properties of TheraCal, a new light‐curable pulp‐capping material composed of resin and calcium silicate (Portland cement), compared with reference pulp‐capping materials (ProRoot MTA and Dycal). Methodology Calcium (Ca) and hydroxyl (OH) ion release over 28 days, solubility and water uptake (weight percentage variation, Δ%) at 24 h, cure depth and radiopacity of TheraCal, ProRoot MTA and Dycal were evaluated. Statistical analysis (P < 0.05) of release of ion was carried out by two‐way repeated measures anova with Tukey, whilst one‐way anova with Tukey test was used for the other tests. Results TheraCal released significantly more calcium than ProRoot MTA and Dycal throughout the test period. TheraCal was able to alkalinize the surrounding fluid initially to pH 10–11 (3 h–3 days) and subsequently to pH 8–8.5 (7–14 days). TheraCal had a cure depth of 1.7 mm. The solubility of TheraCal (Δ−1.58%) was low and significantly less than that of Dycal (Δ−4.58%) and ProRoot MTA (Δ−18.34%). The amount of water absorbed by TheraCal (Δ +10.42%) was significantly higher than Dycal (Δ +4.87%) and significantly lower than ProRoot MTA (Δ +13.96%). Conclusions TheraCal displayed higher calcium‐releasing ability and lower solubility than either ProRoot MTA or Dycal. The capability of TheraCal to be cured to a depth of 1.7 mm may avoid the risk of untimely dissolution. These properties offer major advantages in direct pulp‐capping treatments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02013.x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 294

Metadata

Authors
Gandolfi, M. G., Siboni, F., & Prati, C.
Venue
International Endodontic Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-03-31
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
571-579
ISSN
  • 0143-2885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2591
OpenAlex
W2135161263
Cited by
294
References
27
FWCI
14.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemical–physical properties of TheraCal, a novel light‐curable MTA‐like material for pulp capping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02013.x
The paper
Gandolfi, M. G., Siboni, F., & Prati, C. (2012). Chemical–physical properties of TheraCal, a novel light‐curable MTA‐like material for pulp capping. International Endodontic Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02013.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.