Semen quality in fertile US men in relation to geographical area and pesticide exposure
Open accessAbstract
Summary: We conducted the first US study to compare semen quality among study centres using standardized methods and strict quality control. We present data on semen quality in partners of 493 pregnant women recruited through prenatal clinics in four US cities during 1999–2001. Sperm concentration, semen volume and motility were determined at the centres and morphology was assessed at a central laboratory. While between‐centre differences in sperm morphology and sample volume were small, sperm concentration and motility were significantly reduced in Columbia, MO (MO) relative to men in New York, NY, Minneapolis, MN and Los Angeles, CA; total number of motile sperm was 113 × 10 6 in MO and 162, 201 and 196 × 10 6 in CA, MN and NY respectively. Differences among centres remained significant in multivariate models that controlled for abstinence time, semen analysis time, age, race, smoking, history of sexually transmitted disease and recent fever (all p ‐values <0.01). We hypothesized that poorer sperm concentration and motility in MO men relative to other centres might be related to agricultural pesticides that are commonly used in the mid‐west. We investigated this hypothesis by conducting a nested case–control study within the MO cohort. We selected 25 men in this cohort for whom all semen parameters (concentration, % normal morphology and % motile) were low as cases and an equal number of men for whom all semen parameters were within normal limits as controls. We measured metabolites of eight non‐persistent, current‐use pesticides in urine samples the men had provided at the time of semen collection. Pesticide metabolite levels were elevated in cases compared with controls for the herbicides alachlor and atrazine, and for the insecticide diazinon (2‐isopropoxy‐4‐methyl‐pyrimidinol) ( p ‐values for Wilcoxon rank test = 0.0007, 0.012, and 0.0004 for alachlor, atrazine and diazinon respectively). Men with higher levels of alachlor or diazinon were significantly more likely to be cases than men with low levels [odds ratios (OR) = 30.0, 16.7 for alachlor and diazinon respectively], as were men with atrazine over the limit of detection (OR = 11.3). These associations between current‐use pesticides and reduced semen quality suggest that agricultural chemicals may have contributed to the reduced semen quality seen in fertile men from mid‐Missouri.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Outcomes are inconsistent for studies correlating lifestyle and environmental exposures with sperm morphology.
“Likewise, outcomes are inconsistent for studies correlating lifestyle and environmental exposures with sperm morphology (11, 12, 13, 14, 15).”
From Poor reproducibility of percentage of normally shaped sperm using the World Health Organization Fifth Edition strict grading criteria (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
The Between-centre differences in semen parameters section reports differing associations with morphology: smoking and age had little or no effect, while men with a history of an STD had fewer morphologically normal sperm. The Pesticide exposure and semen quality section reports mixed pesticide associations with overall semen quality, but does not isolate effects on morphology or establish that findings across studies are inconsistent. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Brazil, C., Swan, S. H., Drobnis, E. Z., Liu, F., Wang, C., Redmon, J. B., Overstreet, J. W. and the Study for Future Families Research Group. (2004a) Standardized methods for semen evaluation in a multicenter research study. Journal of Andrology 25, 635-644.
- Brazil, C., Swan, S. H., Tollner, C. R., Treece, C., Drobnis, E. Z., Wang, C., Redmon, J. B., Overstreet, J. W. and the Study for Future Families Research Group. (2004b) Quality control of laboratory methods for semen evalua- tion in a multicenter research study. Journal of Andrology 25, 645-656.
- Guzick, D. S., Overstreet, J. W., Factor-Litvak, P., Brazil, C. K., Nakajima, S. T., Coutifaris, C. et al. (2001) Sperm morphol- ogy, motility, and concentration in fertile and infertile men. New England Journal of Medicine 345, 1388-1393.
- Hollander, M. & Wolfe, D. A. (1999) Nonparametric Statistical Methods, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
- Overstreet, J. W. & Brazil, C. (1997) Semen analysis. In: Infer- tility in the Male (eds L. I. Lipshultz & S. S. Howards), pp. 487-490. Mosby-Year Book, Inc., St Louis.
- World Health Organization. (1999) WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction, 4th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; New York, NY.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Baker, K. C., Steiner, A. Z., Hansen, K. R., Barnhart, K. T., Cedars, M. I., Legro, R. S., Diamond, M. P., Krawetz, S. A., Usadi, R., Baker, V. L., et al. (2022) · F&S Reports · doi:10.1016/j.xfre.2022.03.003 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Swan, S. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Rochester Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Swan, Shanna H.
- ORCID
- Swan, Shanna H.
- Venue
- International Journal of Andrology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 62-68
- ISSN
- 0105-6263 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2605
- OpenAlex
- W2015970508
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 10.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Andrology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Minnesota
- National Institutes of Health
- University of California, Davis
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES009916)
- National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000400, M01RR000425)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
- Keywords
- semen quality, male fertility, pesticide exposure, agricultural pesticides, alachlor, atrazine, diazinon, pesticide metabolites, urinary biomarkers, sperm concentration, sperm motility, sperm morphology, current-use pesticides, reproductive toxicology, Columbia, Missouri, herbicides, insecticides, sexually transmitted infections
- MeSH terms
- Agriculture, Environmental Exposure, Geography, Humans, Infertility, Male, Male, Missouri, Pesticides, Regression Analysis, Semen, Sperm Count, Sperm Motility, Spermatozoa, United States, Cohort Studies, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review