Cited by 78Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic speciesPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Aneuploidy and DNA fragmentation in morphologically abnormal sperm

Open access
Tang, S. S., Gao, H., Zhao, Y., Ma, S.·2010·International Journal of Andrology

Abstract

In light of the relative success of ICSI in the treatment of male infertility, much importance has been made to the selection of morphologically viable sperm. However, correlation between specific sperm morphology and chromosomal abnormalities is still relatively limited and less is known about the connection between sperm morphology and DNA integrity. Sperm obtained from isolated teratozoospermic men (n = 10) and control men (n = 9) were analysed using FISH (for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y) and TUNEL assays to determine the level of aneuploidy and DNA fragmentation. Sperm morphology was evaluated on its ability to identify the level of chromosomal abnormalities or fragmented DNA in sperm. Sperm from teratozoospermic men, compared with fertile men, had higher rates of total chromosomal abnormality (p < 0.05), total aneuploidy (p < 0.01) and chromosome 13 disomy (p < 0.01). Associations between particular types of sperm morphology and chromosomal abnormalities were observed in both control (tapered heads) and teratozoospermic (amorphous heads and tail abnormalities) samples. Levels of DNA fragmented sperm were higher in teratozoospermic men than in the control men (60.28 +/- 21.40% vs. 32.40 +/- 17.20%, p < 0.05) and positively correlated to sperm with bent necks in control samples and round heads in teratozoospermic samples (p < 0.05). Sperm of isolated teratozoospermic men have higher rates of chromosomal abnormalities and DNA fragmentation than that of the fertile contr…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2009.00982.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tang, S. S., Gao, H., Zhao, Y., & Ma, S.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Ma, S.
Venue
International Journal of Andrology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-01-08
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
e163-79
ISSN
  • 0105-6263 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2605
OpenAlex
W1956277467
Cited by
78
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Andrology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • cIRcle (University of British Columbia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Open Collections
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (BMH86005, MOP53067)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Keywords
sperm morphology, aneuploidy, sperm DNA fragmentation, teratozoospermia, male infertility, sperm selection, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, sperm head abnormalities
MeSH terms
Aneuploidy, Chromosome Aberrations, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 13, Humans, Infertility, Male, Male, Spermatozoa, Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic, DNA Fragmentation, Semen Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review