Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The relationship between caries in the primary dentition at 5 years of age and permanent dentition at 10 years of age – a longitudinal study

Open access
SKEIE, M. S., RAADAL, M., STRAND, G. V., ESPELID, I.·2006·International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry

Abstract

Summary. Objectives. To explore a possible relationship between the caries experience and pattern in the primary dentition at 5 years of age and the permanent dentition at 10 years of age. Further, to examine the possibility of predicting children in a caries‐risk group at 5 years verified at 10 years of age. Materials and methods. A sample of 186 children (90 males) were clinically examined as 5‐year‐olds and re‐examined as 10‐year‐olds by calibrated dentists. A five‐graded diagnostic system including enamel caries was used. Bitewing radiographs were taken. A true risk group of children at 10 years were defined as those with at least one dentin or filled lesion on the mesial surface of 6‐year molars, and/or on incisors, and/or total DMFS (decayed, missing, and filled surfaces) more than 1 SD above the mean. The prediction was measured in terms of OR (odds ratio), sensitivity/specificity, and receiver operating characteristic curves. Results. Statistically significant correlations (r = 0·5) were found between the caries experience in the two dentitions as well as between the primary second molars at baseline and the permanent teeth at 10 years. ‘Primary second molars’ and ‘all primary molars’ were the most powerful predictors for allocation into the risk group (24% of the sample). The highest achieved sum of sensitivity and specificity, 148%, was attained at a cut‐off point above two carious surfaces in enamel and/or dentin in primary second molars. Conclusions. Statistically significant relationship in disease between the dentitions was found. More than two surfaces with caries experience in primary second molars are suggested as a clinically useful predictor at 5 years of age for being at high risk at age 10.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-263x.2006.00720.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
SKEIE, M. S., RAADAL, M., STRAND, G. V., & ESPELID, I.
Venue
International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-04-03
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
152-160
ISSN
  • 0960-7439 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-263X
OpenAlex
W2038839489
Cited by
256
References
1
FWCI
14.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relationship between caries in the primary dentition at 5 years of age and permanent dentition at 10 years of age – a longitudinal study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-263x.2006.00720.x
The paper
SKEIE, M. S., RAADAL, M., STRAND, G. V., & ESPELID, I. (2006). The relationship between caries in the primary dentition at 5 years of age and permanent dentition at 10 years of age – a longitudinal study. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263x.2006.00720.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.