The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The relationship between caries in the primary dentition at 5 years of age and permanent dentition at 10 years of age – a longitudinal study
Open accessAbstract
Summary. Objectives. To explore a possible relationship between the caries experience and pattern in the primary dentition at 5 years of age and the permanent dentition at 10 years of age. Further, to examine the possibility of predicting children in a caries‐risk group at 5 years verified at 10 years of age. Materials and methods. A sample of 186 children (90 males) were clinically examined as 5‐year‐olds and re‐examined as 10‐year‐olds by calibrated dentists. A five‐graded diagnostic system including enamel caries was used. Bitewing radiographs were taken. A true risk group of children at 10 years were defined as those with at least one dentin or filled lesion on the mesial surface of 6‐year molars, and/or on incisors, and/or total DMFS (decayed, missing, and filled surfaces) more than 1 SD above the mean. The prediction was measured in terms of OR (odds ratio), sensitivity/specificity, and receiver operating characteristic curves. Results. Statistically significant correlations (r = 0·5) were found between the caries experience in the two dentitions as well as between the primary second molars at baseline and the permanent teeth at 10 years. ‘Primary second molars’ and ‘all primary molars’ were the most powerful predictors for allocation into the risk group (24% of the sample). The highest achieved sum of sensitivity and specificity, 148%, was attained at a cut‐off point above two carious surfaces in enamel and/or dentin in primary second molars. Conclusions. Statistically significant relationship in disease between the dentitions was found. More than two surfaces with caries experience in primary second molars are suggested as a clinically useful predictor at 5 years of age for being at high risk at age 10.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fyffe, H. E., Deery, C., Nugent, Z. J., Nuttall, N. M., & Pitts, N. B. (2000) · Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0528.2000.280106.x · Cited by 128
Cited by
Falsetta, M. L., Klein, M. I., Colonne, P. M., Scott-Anne, K., Gregoire, S., Pai, C.-H., Gonzalez-Begne, M., Watson, G., Krysan, D. J., Bowen, W. H., et al. (2014) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.00087-14 · Cited by 561
Factors associated with prevalence and severity of caries experience in preschool children
Declerck, D., Leroy, R., Martens, L., Lesaffre, E., Garcia‐Zattera, M., Broucke, S. V., Debyser, M., & Hoppenbrouwers, K. (2008) · Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00385.x · Cited by 165
(2008) · PubMed · Cited by 70
Caries in adolescence–influence from early childhood
Alm, A., Wendt, L. K., Koch, G., Birkhed, D., & Nilsson, M. (2012) · Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0528.2011.00647.x · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- SKEIE, M. S., RAADAL, M., STRAND, G. V., & ESPELID, I.
- Venue
- International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-04-03
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 152-160
- ISSN
- 0960-7439 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-263X
- OpenAlex
- W2038839489
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relationship between caries in the primary dentition at 5 years of age and permanent dentition at 10 years of age – a longitudinal study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-263x.2006.00720.x
- The paper
- SKEIE, M. S., RAADAL, M., STRAND, G. V., & ESPELID, I. (2006). The relationship between caries in the primary dentition at 5 years of age and permanent dentition at 10 years of age – a longitudinal study. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263x.2006.00720.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.