The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysing qualitative interview data: addressing issues of validity andreliability
Abstract
Over the last 20 years qualitative research methods have increased in popularity in the field of nursing research, yet critical issues of validity and reliability are often overlooked in published research reports Thus, the aim of this paper is to describe the steps which the author followed to address issues of rigour in one qualitative research study The study was conducted to explore the health visitor's role in identifying and working with vulnerable families in the community in relation to child protection Thispaper will focus on how issues of validity and reliability were addressed in terms of qualitative interview data
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The problem of rigor in qualitative research
Sandelowski, M. (1986) · Advances in Nursing Science · doi:10.1097/00012272-198604000-00005 · Cited by 2,772
A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research
Burnard, P. (1991) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/0260-6917(91)90009-y · Cited by 2,510
Problems of Reliability and Validity in Ethnographic Research
LeCompte, M. D., & Goetz, J. P. (1982) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543052001031 · Cited by 1,740
Cited by
Reliability in Coding Open-Ended Data: Lessons Learned from HIV Behavioral Research
Hruschka, D. J., Schwartz, D., St.John, D. C., Picone-Decaro, E., Jenkins, R. A., & Carey, J. W. (2004) · Field Methods · doi:10.1177/1525822x04266540 · Cited by 829
Zhou, S., Blazquez, M., McCormick, H., & Barnes, L. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.011 · Cited by 181
Tye, C. C., & Ross, F. M. (2000) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01380.x · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Appleton, J. V.
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-11
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 993-997
- ISSN
- 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2648
- OpenAlex
- W2136679425
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 22.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysing qualitative interview data: addressing issues of validity andreliability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1995.tb02653.x
- The paper
- Appleton, J. V. (1995). Analysing qualitative interview data: addressing issues of validity andreliability. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1995.tb02653.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
