The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Companion to Qualitative Research
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft
Myers, M. D., & Newman, M. (2007) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2006.11.001 · Cited by 1,941
Case Study Method: A Step-by-Step Guide for Business Researchers
Rashid, Y., Rashid, A., Warraich, M. A., Sabir, S. S., & Waseem, A. (2019) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/1609406919862424 · Cited by 804
Ready or not, AI comes—an interview study of organizational AI readiness factors
Jöhnk, J., Weißert, M., & Wyrtki, K. (2021) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-020-00676-7 · Cited by 637
Facilitators and Barriers to Child Sexual Abuse (CSA) Disclosures: A Research Update (2000–2016)
Alaggia, R., Collin-Vézina, D., & Lateef, R. (2019) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838017697312 · Cited by 636
Metadata
- Authors
- Schofield, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-05-31
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 675-675
- ISSN
- 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2648
- OpenAlex
- W2149997269
- Cited by
- 1,362
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 57.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Companion to Qualitative Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03486_1.x
- The paper
- Schofield, P. (2005). A Companion to Qualitative Research. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03486_1.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
