The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of the expectations of filial piety scale–Spanish version.
Open accessAbstract
Aims. This paper reports the development of the Expectations of Filial Piety Scale for use with Hispanic/Latino parents regarding their expectations of care and support from their adult children. Background. Filial piety, a term used to describe a set of family values in relation to parental care and respect, has strong cultural underpinnings. To date, there have been no measures of this construct for use with Hispanic/Latino populations. Methods. A convenience sample of 318 Hispanic/Latino adults in North Carolina and Texas in the United States of America completed a brief biographical survey and field‐tested a new Spanish version of the Expectations of Filial Piety Scale in 2003. Results. Principal component factor analysis with orthogonal rotation (varimax method) was used to extract four factors, which accounted for 60% of the variance in scale scores. These factors were: I, respect for parents (23·6%); II, honouring parents (12·5%); III, supporting parents (11·9%); and IV, family unity (11·7%). Overall scale reliability was 0·82, with individual factor reliability coefficients ranging from 0·66 to 0·84. Conclusions. Increasingly, large numbers of Hispanic/Latino elders will look to their families for support as they reach advanced ages. Culturally relevant translations of family caregiving constructs, such as filial piety, will be essential nursing tools for clinical practice and in developing contemporary family caregiver research agendas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Unger et al. (2002) and Schwartz et al. (2010) identified familism with authoritarian aspects of filial piety, but Kao and Travis’ (2005) expanded their conception of familism to encompass both authoritarian and relational aspects.”
From Evolution of the Conceptualization of Filial Piety in the Global Context: From Skin to Skeleton (2021) · cites this paper as Kao and Travis’ (2005)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Both aspects of filial piety were identified as relevant to filial measures developed for Hispanic (Kao and Travis’, 2005), Arabic (Khalaila, 2010), and Malay (Tan et al., 2019) societies.”
From Evolution of the Conceptualization of Filial Piety in the Global Context: From Skin to Skeleton (2021) · cites this paper as Kao and Travis’, 2005
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Methods for Health Care Research
Wegner, G. D. (1995) · Journal of Gerontological Nursing · doi:10.3928/0098-9134-19950701-15 · Cited by 1,438
Measurement in Cross-Cultural Psychology
Hui, C.-C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1985) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022002185016002001 · Cited by 1,092
Developing Instruments for Cross-Cultural Psychiatric Research
Flaherty, J. A., Gaviria, F. M., Pathak, D. S., Mitchell, T., Wintrob, R. M., Richman, J. A., & Birz, S. (1988) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-198805000-00001 · Cited by 820
Handbook of Family Measurement Techniques.
Klein, D. M., Touliatos, J., Perlmutter, B. F., & Straus, M. A. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2072136 · Cited by 278
Current issues in cross-cultural quality of life instrument development
Schmidt, S., & Bullinger, M. (2003) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1053/apmr.2003.50244 · Cited by 192
Methods to document semantic equivalence of a translated scale
Beck, C. T., Bernal, H., & Froman, R. D. (2003) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.10066 · Cited by 186
Age at Migration, Social Connections, and Well-Being among Elderly Hispanics
Angel, J. L., & Angel, R. J. (1992) · Journal of Aging and Health · doi:10.1177/089826439200400402 · Cited by 143
Improving access to health care in Latino communities.
Valdez, R. B., Giachello, A. L. M., Rodriguez-Trias, H., et al. (1993) · PubMed · Cited by 94
Methodological concerns for non‐Hispanic investigators conducting research with Hispanic Americans
Lange, J. (2002) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.10049 · Cited by 80
2- versus 4-Hour Evening Phototherapy of Seasonal Affective Disorder
Doghramji, K., Gaddy, J. R., Stewart, K. T., Rosenthal, N. E., & Brainard, G. C. (1990) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-199004000-00007 · Cited by 18
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Dai Y.T., 1995, The effects of family support, expectations of filial piety, and stress on health consequences of older adults with diabetes mellitus
- Hurtado A., 1995, Understanding Latino Families, 49
- Vega W.A., 1995, Understanding Latino Families, 3
Cited by
Evolution of the Conceptualization of Filial Piety in the Global Context: From Skin to Skeleton
Bedford, O., & Yeh, K.-H. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.570547 · Cited by 146
Chan, C. L. W., Ho, A. H. Y., Leung, P. P. Y., Chochinov, H. M., Neimeyer, R. A., Pang, S. M. C., & Tse, D. M. W. (2012) · Journal of Ethnic And Cultural Diversity in Social Work · doi:10.1080/15313204.2012.729177 · Cited by 118
Development and evaluation of the Arabic filial piety scale.
Khalaila, R. (2010) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/1049731510369495 · Cited by 32
Khalaila, R. (2022) · Research in Gerontological Nursing · doi:10.3928/19404921-20220930-02 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Kao, H. S., & Travis, S. S.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
- George Mason University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-11-18
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 682-688
- ISSN
- 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2648
- OpenAlex
- W2081361356
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 9.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing care and research
- Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
- Keywords
- filial piety, Hispanic/Latino families, family caregiving, scale development, Spanish translation, family unity, respect for parents, family support for older adults
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cultural Characteristics, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Home Nursing, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, North Carolina, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Texas, Intergenerational Relations, Caregivers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review