The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors contributing to frailty: literature review
Abstract
Aim. This paper presents a review of theoretical and research literature in order to identify the factors contributing to frailty. Background. Frailty is a multifaceted gerontological concept that lacks a clear definition, but may result from an identifiable homogeneous cluster of bio–psycho–social–spiritual factors. Method. A total of 134 articles were identified through a search of the MEDLINE (1966 to July 2004), CINAHL (1982 to July 2004), PsychInfo (1985 to July 2004) and Ageline (1995 to July 2004) databases. Each article was reviewed to determine its fit with inclusion/exclusion criteria. Seven research and 11 theoretical articles were retained and further reviewed for methodological quality using a validity tool. Findings. Seventeen different definitions of frailty were identified. Regardless of the differing definitions, common contributing factors could be identified. Physical, cognitive/psychological, nutritional and social factors, as well as ageing and disease, were evident in both the theoretical and research literature. Conclusions. Although there is strong agreement that a relationship exists between a cluster of factors and frailty, designation of the factors as contributors or outcomes of frailty differs. Without a clear explanatory theory of the path from contributors to frailty to outcomes, research will continue to produce confusing results. A theoretical framework that includes bio–psycho–social–spiritual factors as contributors to frailty is recommended as the most useful framework for gerontological nursing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Frailty in Older Adults: Evidence for a Phenotype
Fried, L. P., Tangen, C. M., Walston, J., Newman, A. B., Hirsch, C., Gottdiener, J., Seeman, T., Tracy, R., Kop, W. J., Burke, G., et al. (2001) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146 · Cited by 24,907
Nations, U. (2017) · Statistical Papers - United Nations (Ser. A), Population and Vital Statistics Report · doi:10.18356/88fa44e7-en · Cited by 400
Leng, S., Chaves, P., Koenig, K., & Walston, J. (2002) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50315.x · Cited by 387
Cited by
Outcome instruments to measure frailty: a systematic review
de Vries, N. M., Staal, J. B., van Ravensberg, C. D., Hobbelen, J. S. M., Olde Rikkert, M. G. M., & Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M. W. G. (2011) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2010.09.001 · Cited by 793
Kulminski, A. M., Ukraintseva, S. V., Kulminskaya, I. V., Arbeev, K. G., Land, K., & Yashin, A. I. (2008) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01656.x · Cited by 434
Towards an integral conceptual model of frailty
Gobbens, R. J. J., Luijkx, K. G., Wijnen-Sponselee, M. T., & Schols, J. M. G. A. (2010) · The Journal of nutrition, health and aging · doi:10.1007/s12603-010-0045-6 · Cited by 434
Peters, L. L., Boter, H., Buskens, E., & Slaets, J. P. J. (2012) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2012.04.007 · Cited by 377
Makizako, H., Shimada, H., Doi, T., Tsutsumimoto, K., & Suzuki, T. (2015) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008462 · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- Levers, M., Estabrooks, C. A., & Ross Kerr, J. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-09-06
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 282-291
- ISSN
- 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2648
- OpenAlex
- W2060646849
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors contributing to frailty: literature review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04021.x
- The paper
- Levers, M., Estabrooks, C. A., & Ross Kerr, J. C. (2006). Factors contributing to frailty: literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04021.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.