Cited by 197Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsQualitative Comparative Analysis ResearchMethodologies in Health Research and Practice

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Qualitative case study methodology in nursing research: an integrative review

Anthony, Susan, Jack, Susan·2009·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

AIM: This paper is a report of an integrative review conducted to critically analyse the contemporary use of qualitative case study methodology in nursing research. BACKGROUND: Increasing complexity in health care and increasing use of case study in nursing research support the need for current examination of this methodology. DATA SOURCES: In 2007, a search for case study research (published 2005-2007) indexed in the CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, Sociological Abstracts and SCOPUS databases was conducted. A sample of 42 case study research papers met the inclusion criteria. METHODS: Whittemore and Knafl's integrative review method guided the analysis. RESULTS: Confusion exists about the name, nature and use of case study. This methodology, including terminology and concepts, is often invisible in qualitative study titles and abstracts. Case study is an exclusive methodology and an adjunct to exploring particular aspects of phenomena under investigation in larger or mixed-methods studies. A high quality of case study exists in nursing research. CONCLUSION: Judicious selection and diligent application of literature review methods promote the development of nursing science. Case study is becoming entrenched in the nursing research lexicon as a well-accepted methodology for studying phenomena in health and social care, and its growing use warrants continued appraisal to promote nursing knowledge development. Attention to all case study elements, process and publication is important in promoting authenticity, methodological quality and visibility.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.04998.x

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 70 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Creswell J.W., 1998, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design
  2. DuFour S., 1992, Annotated bibliography on case study method, Current Sociology, 40, 167
  3. 10.1177/152692480601600405 · DOI
  4. Sandelowski M., 2007, Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research
  5. Yin Y.R., 1994, Case Study Research Design and Methods

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–195 of 195

Metadata

Authors
Anthony, S., & Jack, S.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-04-22
Volume
65
Issue
6
Pages
1171-1181
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W2166051865
Cited by
197
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 11
FWCI
8.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
Keywords
nursing research methodology, methodological quality, research visibility, mixed methods, nursing knowledge development, scientific publications
MeSH terms
Humans, Terminology as Topic, Research Design, Nursing Research, Nursing Methodology Research, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review