The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nurse‐led self‐management group programme for patients with congestive heart failure: randomized controlled trial
Abstract
smeulders e.s.t.f., van haastregt j.c.m., ambergen t., uszko‐lencer n.h.k.m., janssen‐boyne j.j.j., gorgels a.p.m., stoffers h.e.j.h., lodewijks‐van der bolt c.l.b., van eijk j.th.m. & kempen g.i.j.m. (2010) Nurse‐led self‐management group programme for patients with congestive heart failure: randomized controlled trial. Journal of Advanced Nursing 66(7), 1487–1499. Title. Nurse‐led self‐management group programme for patients with congestive heart failure: randomized controlled trial. Aim. This paper reports on of the effects of the Chronic Disease Self‐Management Programme on psychosocial attributes, self‐care behaviour and quality of life among congestive heart failure patients who experienced slight to marked limitation of physical activity. Background. Most self‐management programmes for congestive heart failure patients emphasize the medical aspects of this chronic condition, without incorporating psychosocial aspects of self‐management. The programme has been used with various patient groups, but its effectiveness with congestive heart failure patients when led by pairs of cardiac nurse specialists and peer leaders is unknown. Method. A randomized controlled trial with 12 months of follow‐up from start of the programme was conducted with 317 patients. Control group patients (n = 131) received usual care, consisting of regular outpatient checkups. Intervention group patients (n = 186) received usual care and participated in the six‐week self‐management programme. The programme teaches patients medical, social and emotional self‐management skills. Twenty‐one classes were conducted in six hospitals in the Netherlands, and data were collected between August 2004 and January 2007. Results. Directly after the programme, statistically significant effects were found for cognitive symptom management (P < 0·001), self‐care behaviour (P = 0·008) and cardiac‐specific quality of life (P = 0·005). No effects were found at 6‐ and 12‐month follow‐up. Conclusion. Further research is necessary to study how long‐term effectiveness of the programme with patients with congestive heart failure can be achieved, and how successful adaptations of the programme can be integrated into standard care.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In many clinical conditions, such as diabetes mellitus and congestive heart failure, 63 outcomes and QOL are improved when patients have access to their clinical data and play a role in managing their own symptoms.64,65”
From Managing with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (2013) · cites this paper as [63]
Citations
Cites
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x · Cited by 47,139
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
Cohen, J. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 · Cited by 8,771
Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C. (1978) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136319 · Cited by 7,791 · cited 1×
“Unfortunately, many patients with CHF fail to adhere to the complex regimen (Riegel & Carlson 2002, van der Wal & Jaarsma 2008).”
BackgroundSelf-management education: History, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms
Lorig, K. R., & Holman, H. R. (2003) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1207/s15324796abm2601_01 · Cited by 4,094
The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and Validation
Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. W. (1982) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1982.51.2.663 · Cited by 4,028
Bandura, A. (1997) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.8 · Cited by 3,499
The rand 36‐item health survey 1.0
Hays, R. D., Sherbourne, C. D., & Mazel, R. M. (1993) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.4730020305 · Cited by 2,971
Lorig, K. R., Sobel, D. S., Stewart, A. L., Brown, B. W., Bandura, A., Ritter, P., Gonzalez, V. M., Laurent, D. D., & Holman, H. R. (1999) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199901000-00003 · Cited by 2,261
Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure: executive summary (update 2005)
Swedberg, K. B., Cleland, J. G. F., Dargie, H., Drexler, H., Folláth, F., Michel Komajda, N., Tavazzi, L., Smiseth, O. A., Gavazzi, A., Haverich, A., et al. (2005) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi204 · Cited by 2,259
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 · DOI · Paper page
- Guyatt G., 1987, Use of the six‐minute walk test as an outcome measure in clinical trials in chronic heart failure, Heart Failure, 3, 211
- Kempen G.I.M., 1992, Psychometric Properties of GLAS Baseline Measures: A Pilot Study (in Dutch)
- Van Der Zee K.I., 1993, Het meten van de algemene gezondheidstoestand met de RAND‐36, een handleiding
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Disease management interventions for heart failure
Takeda, A., Martin, N., Taylor, R. S., & Taylor, S. J. (2019) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002752.pub4 · Cited by 201
Metzelthin, S., van Rossum, E., de Witte, L., Ambergen, A. W., Hobma, S., Sipers, W. M. W. H., & Kempen, G. I. J. M. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.f5264 · Cited by 171
Self-citationJeyanantham, K., Kotecha, D., Thanki, D., Dekker, R. L., & Lane, D. (2017) · Heart Failure Reviews · doi:10.1007/s10741-017-9640-5 · Cited by 116
Jonkman, N. H., Westland, H., Groenwold, R. H. H., Ågren, S., Anguita, M. P., Blue, L., de la Porte, P. W. F. B., DeWalt, D. A., Hebert, P. L., Heisler, M., et al. (2016) · Journal of Cardiac Failure · doi:10.1016/j.cardfail.2016.06.422 · Cited by 134
Self-citationBarnason, S. A., White‐Williams, C., Rossi, L., Centeno, M., Crabbe, D. L., Lee, K. S., McCabe, N. M., Nauser, J. A., Schulz, P., Stamp, K. D., et al. (2017) · Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · doi:10.1161/hcq.0000000000000025 · Cited by 126
Metadata
- Authors
- Smeulders, E. S. T. F., Van Haastregt, J. C. M., Ambergen, T., Uszko‐Lencer, N. H. K. M., Janssen‐Boyne, J. J. J., Gorgels, A. P. M., Stoffers, H. E. J. H., Lodewijks‐van der Bolt, C. L. B., Van Eijk, J. T. M., & Kempen, G. I. J. M.
- Affiliations
- Maastricht University (NL)
- Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-06-02
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1487-1499
- ISSN
- 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2648
- OpenAlex
- W1905371906
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing care and research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
- Keywords
- congestive heart failure, self-management, nurse-led intervention, peer leaders, self-care behavior, quality of life, psychosocial aspects, symptom management, physical activity limitation
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Chronic Disease, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Netherlands, Quality of Life, Self Care, Nursing Evaluation Research, Cardiology Service, Hospital, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Self Efficacy, Practice Patterns, Nurses'
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
