What information counts at the moment of practice? Information practices of renal nurses
Open accessAbstract
bonner a. & lloyd a. (2011) What information counts at the moment of practice? Information practices of renal nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing67(6), 1213–1221. Aims. This article is a report of a study done to identify how renal nurses experience information about renal care and the information practices that they used to support everyday practice. Background. What counts as nursing knowledge remains a contested area in the discipline yet little research has been undertaken. Information practice encompasses a range of activities such as seeking, evaluation and sharing of information. The ability to make informed judgement is dependent on nurses being able to identify relevant sources of information that inform their practice and those sources of information may enable the identification of what knowledge is important to nursing practice. Method. The study was philosophically framed from a practice perspective and informed by Habermas and Schatzki; it employed qualitative research techniques. Using purposive sampling six registered nurses working in two regional renal units were interviewed during 2009 and data was thematically analysed. Findings. The information practices of renal nurses involved mapping an information landscape in which they drew on information obtained from epistemic, social and corporeal sources. They also used coupling, a process of drawing together information from a range of sources, to enable them to practice. Conclusion. Exploring how nurses engage with information, and the role the information plays in situating and enacting epistemic, social and corporeal knowledge into everyday nursing practice is instructive because it indicates that nurses must engage with all three modalities in order to perform effectively, efficiently and holistically in the context of patient care.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a study of renal care nurses, the importance of corporeal information to the workplace performance and learning of nurses was revealed.
“In a study of renal care nurses (Bonner & Lloyd, 2011) revealed the importance of corporeal information to the workplace performance and learning of nurses.”
From Informed Bodies: Does the Corporeal Experience Matter to Information Literacy Practice? (2014) · cites this paper as Bonner & Lloyd, 2011
Nurses in the renal care study recognized that not only their own bodies but also the bodies of their patients and other nurses acted as important sites to inform information literacy practice and learning.
“Nurses in this study recognized that it was not only their own bodies that acted as sites of information, but also the bodies of their patients and of other nurses, which acted as important sites to inform information literacy practice and learning.”
From Informed Bodies: Does the Corporeal Experience Matter to Information Literacy Practice? (2014) · cites this paper as Bonner & Lloyd, 2011
The body and corporeal modality are a central site of information that contributed to the information literacy experience and practice of novices and experts.
“to date the analysis of this data has suggested that the body and corporeal modality are a central site of information that contributed to the information literacy experience and practice of novices and experts.”
From Informed Bodies: Does the Corporeal Experience Matter to Information Literacy Practice? (2014) · cites this paper as Bonner & Lloyd, 2011
Nurses in the renal care study reported the importance of learning to access corporeal information in order to inform their decision-making.
“Nurses in this study reported the importance of learning to access corporeal information in order to inform their decision-making.”
From Informed Bodies: Does the Corporeal Experience Matter to Information Literacy Practice? (2014) · cites this paper as Bonner & Lloyd, 2011
Cites
Sources of Practice Knowledge Among Nurses
Estabrooks, C. A., Rutakumwa, W., O’Leary, K. A., Profetto-McGrath, J., Milner, M., Levers, M. J., & Scott-Findlay, S. (2005) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732304273702 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Information Literacy Landscapes
Lloyd, A. (2010) · Chandos Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1533/9781780630298 · Cited by 174 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Lloyd (2010a) defines information practice as an array of human activities and skills, which are constituted, justified and organized through the social site and mediated materially socially and corporeally in the production of shared understandings.”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Informed Bodies: Does the Corporeal Experience Matter to Information Literacy Practice?
Lloyd, A. (2014) · Library and Information Science · doi:10.1108/s1876-056220140000010003 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Bonner, A., & Lloyd, A.
- Affiliations
- Charles Sturt University (AU)
- ORCID
- Bonner, Ann
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-03-07
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1213-1221
- ISSN
- 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2648
- OpenAlex
- W1606094729
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 9.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Charles Sturt University Research Output (CRO) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Charles Sturt University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
- Keywords
- information practices, nephrology nursing, nursing knowledge, information seeking, information evaluation, information sharing, coupling, epistemic knowledge, social knowledge, renal units
- MeSH terms
- Ambulatory Care, Australia, Clinical Competence, Renal Dialysis, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Kidney Diseases, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Nursing Staff, Nursing Theory, Qualitative Research, Evidence-Based Nursing, Information Seeking Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review