Cited by 92Health Sciences Research and EducationNursing education and managementNursing Diagnosis and Documentation

What information counts at the moment of practice? Information practices of renal nurses

Open access
Bonner, Ann, Lloyd, Annemaree·2011·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

bonner a. & lloyd a. (2011) What information counts at the moment of practice? Information practices of renal nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing67(6), 1213–1221. Aims. This article is a report of a study done to identify how renal nurses experience information about renal care and the information practices that they used to support everyday practice. Background. What counts as nursing knowledge remains a contested area in the discipline yet little research has been undertaken. Information practice encompasses a range of activities such as seeking, evaluation and sharing of information. The ability to make informed judgement is dependent on nurses being able to identify relevant sources of information that inform their practice and those sources of information may enable the identification of what knowledge is important to nursing practice. Method. The study was philosophically framed from a practice perspective and informed by Habermas and Schatzki; it employed qualitative research techniques. Using purposive sampling six registered nurses working in two regional renal units were interviewed during 2009 and data was thematically analysed. Findings. The information practices of renal nurses involved mapping an information landscape in which they drew on information obtained from epistemic, social and corporeal sources. They also used coupling, a process of drawing together information from a range of sources, to enable them to practice. Conclusion. Exploring how nurses engage with information, and the role the information plays in situating and enacting epistemic, social and corporeal knowledge into everyday nursing practice is instructive because it indicates that nurses must engage with all three modalities in order to perform effectively, efficiently and holistically in the context of patient care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05613.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a study of renal care nurses, the importance of corporeal information to the workplace performance and learning of nurses was revealed.

    “In a study of renal care nurses (Bonner & Lloyd, 2011) revealed the importance of corporeal information to the workplace performance and learning of nurses.”
  • Nurses in the renal care study recognized that not only their own bodies but also the bodies of their patients and other nurses acted as important sites to inform information literacy practice and learning.

    “Nurses in this study recognized that it was not only their own bodies that acted as sites of information, but also the bodies of their patients and of other nurses, which acted as important sites to inform information literacy practice and learning.”
  • The body and corporeal modality are a central site of information that contributed to the information literacy experience and practice of novices and experts.

    “to date the analysis of this data has suggested that the body and corporeal modality are a central site of information that contributed to the information literacy experience and practice of novices and experts.”
  • Nurses in the renal care study reported the importance of learning to access corporeal information in order to inform their decision-making.

    “Nurses in this study reported the importance of learning to access corporeal information in order to inform their decision-making.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bonner, A., & Lloyd, A.
Affiliations
Charles Sturt University (AU)
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03-07
Volume
67
Issue
6
Pages
1213-1221
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W1606094729
Cited by
92
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Charles Sturt University Research Output (CRO) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
Charles Sturt University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Keywords
information practices, nephrology nursing, nursing knowledge, information seeking, information evaluation, information sharing, coupling, epistemic knowledge, social knowledge, renal units
MeSH terms
Ambulatory Care, Australia, Clinical Competence, Renal Dialysis, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Kidney Diseases, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Nursing Staff, Nursing Theory, Qualitative Research, Evidence-Based Nursing, Information Seeking Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review