Cited by 145Optimism, Hope, and Well-beingCancer survivorship and careAging and Gerontology Research

Hope, older adults, and chronic illness: a metasynthesis of qualitative research

Duggleby, Wendy, Hicks, Deborah, Nekolaichuk, Cheryl, Holtslander, Lorraine, Williams, Allison, Chambers, Thane, Eby, Jeannette·2012·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

Aim To report a metasynthesis review of qualitative research studies exploring the hope experience of older persons with chronic illness. Background Hope is a psychosocial resource used by persons to deal with their chronic illness experience. Data sources A comprehensive search of multiple databases for studies of the hope experience (published 1980-2010) was completed. Inclusion criteria were included qualitative studies of the hope experience of persons (all genders; mean age 60 years and older), with chronic illnesses, and publications in any language and country. Review methods The metasynthesis followed four procedural steps: (a) comprehensive search, (b) quality appraisal, (c) classification of studies, and (d) synthesis of findings. Results Twenty studies were included in the metasynthesis representing research from a variety of different countries and populations with differing medical diagnoses. The characteristics of hope included: (a) dynamic or situational nature, (b) multiple co-existing types, (c) objects that were desirable realistic possibilities, (d) future-focused, and (e) involvement of choice/will. Hope as 'transcending possibilities' represented the integration of two processes of transcendence and positive reappraisal. Reaching inwardly and outwardly and finding meaning and purpose were sub-processes of transcendence, whereas re-evaluating hope in light of illness and finding positive possibilities were sub-processes of positive reappraisal. Conclusions…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05919.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 49 · Cited by 145

Authors
Duggleby, W., Hicks, D., Nekolaichuk, C., Holtslander, L., Williams, A., Chambers, T., & Eby, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University of Saskatchewan (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Duggleby, Wendy
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-01-03
Volume
68
Issue
6
Pages
1211-1223
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W1495721952
Cited by
145
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
hope, older adults, chronic disease, transcendence, positive reappraisal, meaning and purpose, psychosocial resources, suffering, coping strategies
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Affect, Attitude to Health, Chronic Disease, Humans, Middle Aged, Nursing Research, Databases, Bibliographic, Qualitative Research, Sense of Coherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review