Hope, older adults, and chronic illness: a metasynthesis of qualitative research
Abstract
Aim To report a metasynthesis review of qualitative research studies exploring the hope experience of older persons with chronic illness. Background Hope is a psychosocial resource used by persons to deal with their chronic illness experience. Data sources A comprehensive search of multiple databases for studies of the hope experience (published 1980-2010) was completed. Inclusion criteria were included qualitative studies of the hope experience of persons (all genders; mean age 60 years and older), with chronic illnesses, and publications in any language and country. Review methods The metasynthesis followed four procedural steps: (a) comprehensive search, (b) quality appraisal, (c) classification of studies, and (d) synthesis of findings. Results Twenty studies were included in the metasynthesis representing research from a variety of different countries and populations with differing medical diagnoses. The characteristics of hope included: (a) dynamic or situational nature, (b) multiple co-existing types, (c) objects that were desirable realistic possibilities, (d) future-focused, and (e) involvement of choice/will. Hope as 'transcending possibilities' represented the integration of two processes of transcendence and positive reappraisal. Reaching inwardly and outwardly and finding meaning and purpose were sub-processes of transcendence, whereas re-evaluating hope in light of illness and finding positive possibilities were sub-processes of positive reappraisal. Conclusions…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For each included study, CASP items were allocated a score of 1-3.
“For each included study, CASP items were allocated a score of 1- 3 (in accordance with Duggleby et al., 2012; Feder et al., 2006) (Table 2).”
From A meta‐synthesis of how parents of children with autism describe their experience of accessing and using routine healthcare services for their children (2021) · cites this paper as Duggleby et al., 2012
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 49 · Cited by 145
- Authors
- Duggleby, W., Hicks, D., Nekolaichuk, C., Holtslander, L., Williams, A., Chambers, T., & Eby, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- University of Saskatchewan (CA)
- McMaster University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Duggleby, Wendy
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-01-03
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1211-1223
- ISSN
- 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2648
- OpenAlex
- W1495721952
- Cited by
- 145
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Keywords
- hope, older adults, chronic disease, transcendence, positive reappraisal, meaning and purpose, psychosocial resources, suffering, coping strategies
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Affect, Attitude to Health, Chronic Disease, Humans, Middle Aged, Nursing Research, Databases, Bibliographic, Qualitative Research, Sense of Coherence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review