Cited by 88Parasite Biology and Host InteractionsHelminth infection and controlParasites and Host Interactions

Do the helminth parasites of wood mice interact?

Open access
BEHNKE, J. M., GILBERT, F. S., ABU‐MADI, M. A., LEWIS, J. W.·2005·Journal of Animal Ecology

Abstract

1 Two published data sets of helminths of the wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus (L.) were analysed to test the hypothesis that the structure of these component communities is influenced by interactions between species. A range of tests, with differing null models, was applied to tease out the importance of controlling for subgroupings (e.g. sex, age, site, year, season) within the data when searching for significant associations based on prevalence (co-occurrence, presence/absence) or abundance (quantitative associations) data. 2 Significant differences from null models were detected for associations based on prevalence, but when subgroup constraints were taken into consideration, most lost significance. Among three and 15 pair-wise associations possible in data sets 1 and 2, respectively, only that between Trichuris muris and Heligmosomoides polygyrus was not dependent on context, and that between H. polygyrus and Catenotaenia pusilla, while always positive, varied in magnitude among sites of capture. 3 Pair-wise comparisons of abundance revealed three significant associations, only one of which (H. polygyrus with C. pusilla) still remained significant after controlling for quantified extrinsic and intrinsic factors. With increasing burdens of H. polygyrus, mice carried more of other helminth species and this relationship remained significant after controlling for confounding factors. 4 Overall, positive co-occurrences of pairs of helminths of A. sylvaticus were highly context dependent and quantitative associations were weak and not convincing. Therefore, interactions between parasites are unlikely to play a dominant role among the processes that structure the component community of helminths in wood mice, in selected study sites in the south of England.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00995.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The authors of the cited paper concluded that this type of interaction is observed relatively often in experimental infections; however, in wild animal populations, it occurs very rarely.

    “The authors of this paper concluded that this type of interaction is observed relatively often in experimental infections; however, in wild animal populations, it occurs very rarely [24,25].”

    From Distribution of Parasitic Helminths in the Small Intestine of the Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) (2020) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Discussion (page unavailable in our copy) contrasts well-established interactions in laboratory rodent infections with weak field evidence and concludes that quantitative interactions are not dominant in the studied wild wood-mouse communities. It does not conclude that interactions occur very rarely in wild animal populations generally; it explicitly notes interactions in wild rodents and an important role for them in some bird communities. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Abu-Madi, M.A., Behnke, J.M., Lewis, J.W. & Gilbert, F.S. (1998) Descriptive epidemiology of Heligmosomoides poly- gyrus in Apodemus sylvaticus from three contrasting habitats in south-east England. Journal of Helminthology, 72, 93- 100.
  2. Abu-Madi, M.A., Behnke, J.M., Lewis, J.W. & Gilbert, F.S. (2000) Seasonal and site specific variation in the component community structure of intestinal helminths from Apodemus sylvaticus from three contrasting habitats in south-east England. Journal of Helminthology, 74, 7-15.
  3. Behnke, J.M., Ali, N.M.H. & Jenkins, S.N. (1984) Survival to patency of low level infections with Trichuris muris in mice concurrently infected with Nematospiroides dubius. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, 78, 509-517. 13652656, 2005, 5, Downloaded from https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00995.x by Readcube (Labtiva Inc.), Wiley Online Library on [12/07/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License · DOI
  4. J. M. Behnke et al. © 2005 British Ecological Society, Journal of Animal Ecology, 74, 982-993
  5. Behnke, J.M., Barnard, C.J. & Wakelin, D. (1992) Under- standing chronic nematode infections: evolutionary considerations, current hypotheses and the way forward. International Journal for Parasitology, 22, 861-907.
  6. Behnke, J.M., Lewis, J.W., Mohd Zain, S.N. & Gilbert, F.S. (1999) Helminth infections in Apodemus sylvaticus in southern England: interactive effects of host-age, sex and year on prevalence and abundance of infections. Journal of Helmintholology, 73, 31-44.
  7. Bush, A.O. (1990) Helminth communities in avian hosts: determinants of pattern. In: Parasite Communities: Patterns and Processes (eds G.W. Bush & J.M. Aho), pp. 197-232.
  8. Bush, A.O. & Holmes, J.C. (1986) Intestinal helminths of lesser scaup ducks: an interactive community. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 64, 142-152.
  9. Crawley, M.T. (1993) GLIM for Ecologists. Blackwell Scien- tific Press, Oxford.
  10. Ferrari, N., Cattadori, I.M., Nespereira, J., Rizzoli, A. & Hudson, P.J. (2004) The role of host sex in parasite dynamics: field experiments on the yellow-necked mouse Apodemus flavicollis. Ecology Letters, 7, 88-94.
  11. Gregory, R.D., Keymer, A.E. & Clarke, J.R. (1990) Genetics, sex and exposure: the ecology of Heligmosomoides poly- gyrus (Nematoda) in the wood mouse. Journal of Animal Ecology, 59, 363-378.
  12. Haukisalmi, V. & Henttonen, H. (1993) Coexistence in helminths of the bank vole Clethrionomys glareolus. I. Patterns of co-occurrence. Journal of Animal Ecology, 62, 221-229.
  13. Holmes, J.C. (1961) Effects of concurrent infections on Hymenolepis diminuta (Cestoda) and Moniliformis dubius (Acanthocephala). I. General effects and comparison with crowding. Journal of Parasitology, 47, 209-216.
  14. Holmes, J.C. & Price, P.W. (1986) Communities of parasites. In: Community Ecology: Pattern and Process (eds D.J. Anderson & J. Kikkawa), pp. 187-213. Blackwell Scientific Publica- tions, Oxford.
  15. Keymer, A.E. & Dobson, A.P. (1987) The ecology of helminths in populations of small mammals. Mammal Review, 17, 105-116.
  16. Langley, R. & Fairley, J.S. (1982) Seasonal variations in infestations of parasites in a wood mouse Apodemus sylvat- icus population in the west of Ireland. Journal of Zoology (London), 198, 249-261.
  17. Lotz, J.M. & Font, W.F. (1985) Structure of enteric helminth communities in two populations of Eptesicus fuscus (Chiroptera). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 63, 2969- 2978.
  18. Lotz, J.M. & Font, W.F. (1994) Excess positive associations in communities of intestinal helminths of bats: a refined null hypothesis and a test of the facilitation hypothesis. Journal of Parasitology, 80, 398-413.
  19. Lotz, J.M., Bush, A.O. & Font, W.F. (1995) Recruitment- driven, spatially discontinuous communities: a null model for transferred patterns in target communities of intestinal helminths. Journal of Parasitology, 81, 12-24.
  20. Montgomery, S.S.J. & Montgomery, W.I. (1990) Structure, stability and species interactions in helminth communities of wood mice Apodemus sylvaticus. International Journal for Parasitology, 20, 225-242.
  21. Do the helminth parasites of wood mice interact? © 2005 British Ecological Society, Journal of Animal Ecology, 74, 982-993
  22. Moravec, F. (2000) Review of capillariid & trichosomoidid nematodes from mammals in the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic. Acta Societatis Zoologicae Bohemicae, 64, 271-304.
  23. Pearson, D.J. & Taylor, G. (1975) The influence of the nematode Syphacia obvelata on adjuvant arthritis in the rat. Immunology, 29, 391-396.
  24. Petney, T.N. & Andrews, R.H. (1998) Multiparasite com- munities in animals and humans: frequency, structure and pathogenic significance. International Journal for Parasitol- ogy, 28, 377-393.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BEHNKE, J. M., GILBERT, F. S., ABU‐MADI, M. A., & LEWIS, J. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
BEHNKE, J. M.
Venue
Journal of Animal Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-09
Volume
74
Issue
5
Pages
982-993
ISSN
  • 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2656
OpenAlex
W2123017618
Cited by
88
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Animal Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • Qatar University QSpace (Qatar University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasites and Host Interactions
Keywords
helminths, Apodemus sylvaticus, parasite co-occurrence, parasite interactions, community structure, Trichuris muris, Heligmosomoides polygyrus, helminth prevalence, null models, confounding factors, host-parasite interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review