The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rain forest promotes trophic interactions and diversity of trap‐nesting Hymenoptera in adjacent agroforestry
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Human alteration of natural ecosystems to agroecosystems continues to accelerate in tropical countries. The resulting world‐wide decline of rain forest causes a mosaic landscape, comprising simple and complex agroecosystems and patchily distributed rain forest fragments of different quality. Landscape context and agricultural management can be expected to affect both species diversity and ecosystem services by trophic interactions. In Central Sulawesi, Indonesia, 24 agroforestry systems, differing in the distance to the nearest natural forest (0–1415 m), light intensity (37·5–899·6 W/m−2) and number of vascular plant species (7–40 species) were studied. Ten standardized trap nests for bees and wasps, made from reed and knotweed internodes, were exposed in each study site. Occupied nests were collected every month, over a period totalling 15 months. A total of 13 617 brood cells were reared to produce adults of 14 trap‐nesting species and 25 natural enemy species, which were mostly parasitoids. The total number of species was affected negatively by increasing distance from forest and increased with light intensity of agroforestry systems. The parasitoids in particular appeared to benefit from nearby forests. Over a 500‐m distance, the number of parasitoid species decreased from eight to five, and parasitism rates from 12% to 4%. The results show that diversity and parasitism, as a higher trophic interaction and ecosystem service, are enhanced by (i) improved connectivity of agroecosystems with natural habitats such as agroforestry adjacent to rain forest and (ii) management practices to increase light availability in agroforestry, which also enhances richness of flowering plants in the understorey.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Which traits of species predict population declines in experimental forest fragments?
Davies, K. F., Margules, C. R., & Lawrence, J. F. (2000) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[1450:wtospp]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 444
Cited by
A meta-analysis of crop pest and natural enemy response to landscape complexity
Chaplin‐Kramer, R., O’Rourke, M. E., Blitzer, E. J., & Kremen, C. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01642.x · Cited by 1,037
Beyond Reserves: A Research Agenda for Conserving Biodiversity in Human‐modified Tropical Landscapes
Chazdon, R. L., Harvey, C. A., Komar, O., Griffith, D. M., Ferguson, B. G., Martínez‐Ramos, M., Morales, H., Nigh, R., Soto‐Pinto, L., Van Breugel, M., et al. (2009) · Biotropica · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2008.00471.x · Cited by 549
Food security and biodiversity: can we have both? An agroecological analysis
Chappell, M. J., & LaValle, L. A. (2011) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/s10460-009-9251-4 · Cited by 474
Biodiversity in a forest-agriculture mosaic – The changing face of West African rainforests
Norris, K., Asase, A., Collen, B., Gockowksi, J., Mason, J., Phalan, B., & Wade, A. (2010) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.12.032 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- KLEIN, A., STEFFAN‐DEWENTER, I., & TSCHARNTKE, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 315-323
- ISSN
- 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2656
- OpenAlex
- W1526798695
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rain forest promotes trophic interactions and diversity of trap‐nesting Hymenoptera in adjacent agroforestry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01042.x
- The paper
- KLEIN, A., STEFFAN‐DEWENTER, I., & TSCHARNTKE, T. (2006). Rain forest promotes trophic interactions and diversity of trap‐nesting Hymenoptera in adjacent agroforestry. Journal of Animal Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01042.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.