Cited by 370Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecologyEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology

A truce with neutral theory: local deterministic factors, species traits and dispersal limitation together determine patterns of diversity in stream invertebrates

Open access
THOMPSON, ROSS, TOWNSEND, COLIN·2006·Journal of Animal Ecology

Abstract

Summary: Studies seeking to explain local patterns of diversity have typically relied on niche explanations, reflected in correlations with local environmental conditions, or neutral theory, invoking dispersal processes and speciation. We used macroinvertebrate community data from 10 streams that varied independently in local ecological conditions and spatial proximity. Neutral theory predicts that similarity in communities will be negatively associated with distance between sites, while niche theory suggests that community similarity will be positively associated with similarity in local ecological conditions. Similarity in total invertebrate, grazer and predator assemblages showed negative relationships with distance and, for grazers and predators, positive relationships with local ecological conditions. However, the best model predicting community similarity in all three cases included aspects of both local ecological conditions and distance between sites. When assemblages were analysed according to dispersal ability, high‐dispersal species were shown to be freely accessing all sites and community similarity was not well predicted by either local ecology or spatial separation. Assemblages of species with low and moderate dispersal ability were best predicted by combined models, including distance between sites and local ecological factors. The results suggest that the perceived dichotomy between neutral and local environmental processes in determining local patterns of diversity may not be useful. Neutral and niche processes structured these communities differentially depending on trophic level and species traits. We emphasize the potential for both dispersal processes and local environmental conditions to explain local patterns of diversity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01068.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Organisms with different niches are influenced by physicochemical and biological factors as well as dispersal success in more complex ways, leading to greater stochasticity.

    “organisms with different niches are influenced by physicochemical and biological factors as well as dispersal success in more complex ways, leading to greater stochasticity (Cid et al., 2021; Thompson and Town­ send, 2006).”

    From A meta-analysis of environmental responses to freshwater ecosystem restoration in China (1987–2018) (2023) · cites this paper as Thompson and Townsend, 2006

    The Results (page unavailable) show that local ecological factors and spatial distance jointly predicted stream-invertebrate community similarity, with effects differing by dispersal ability. The Discussion (page unavailable) also says trophic groupings and species traits affect the relative importance of niche and neutral factors. The paper does not establish that these interactions lead to greater stochasticity, so that part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Akaike, H. (1973) 2nd International Symposium on Informa- tion Theory, Chapter Information Theory and an Extension of Maximum Likelihood Principle , pp. 267-281. Akademia Kiado.
  2. Alonso, D. & McKane, A.J. (2004) Sampling Hubbell's neu- tral theory of biodiversity. Ecology Letters , 7 , 901-910.
  3. Anderson, D.R., Burnham, K.P. & Thompson, W.L. (2000) Null hypothesis testing: problems, prevalence, and an alter- native. Journal of Wildlife Management , 64 , 912-923.
  4. Bonnet, E. & Van de Peer, Y. (2002) ZT: a software tool for simple and partial Mantel tests. Journal of Statistical Soft- ware , 7 , 1-12.
  5. Gilbert, B. & Lechowicz, M.J. (2003) Neutrality, niches and dispersal in a temperate forest understorey. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 7651-7656.
  6. Holomuzki, J.R. & Messier, S.H. (1993) Habitat selection by the stream mayfly Paraleptophlebia guttata. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 12, 126 -135.
  7. Hubbell, S.P. (2001) The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiver- sity and Biogeography. Princeton University Press.
  8. Kimura, M. (1983) The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolu- tion. Cambridge University Press.
  9. MacArthur, R.H. & Wilson, E.O. (1967) The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press.
  10. Mayr, E. (1991) One Long Argument, p. 152. Harvard Uni- versity Press, Boston, MA.
  11. Mouillot, D., George-Nascimento, M. & Poulin, R. (2003) How parasites divide resources: a test of the niche apportion- ment hypothesis. Journal of Animal Ecology, 72, 757-764.
  12. Ricklefs, R.E. & Schluter, D. eds. (1993) Species Diversity in Ecological Communities: Historical and Geographical Per- spectives. University of Chicago Press.
  13. Schwilk, D.W. & Ackerley, D.D. (2005) Limiting similarity and functional diversity along environmental gradients. Ecology Letters, 8, 272-281.
  14. Sugihara, G., Bersier, L., Southwood, T.R.E., Pimm, S.L. & May, R.M. (2003) Predicted correspondence between species abundances and dendrograms of niche similarities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 5246 -5251.
  15. Thompson and Townsend (2004) Landuse influences on New Zealand stream communities -effects on species composi- tion, functional organization and food-web structure. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 38, 595 -608.
  16. Tilman, D. (1982) Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton University Press.
  17. Tilman, D. (2004) Niche tradeoffs, neutrality, and community structure: a stochastic theory of resource competition, inva- sion and community assembly. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 10854 -10861.
  18. Tokeshi, M. (1999) Species Coexistence: Ecological and Evo- lutionary Perspectives. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
  19. Townsend, C.R., Scarsbrook, M.R. & Dolédec, S. (1997a) Quantifying disturbance in streams: alternative measures of disturbance in relation to macroinvertebrate species traits and species richness. Journal Of the North American Benthological Society, 16, 531-544.
  20. Townsend, C.R., Thompson, R.M., McIntosh, A.R., Kilroy, C., Edwards, E.D. & Scarsbrook, M.R. (1998) Distur- bance, resource supply, and food-web architecture in streams. Ecology Letters, 1, 200 -209.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
THOMPSON, R., & TOWNSEND, C.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
THOMPSON, ROSS
Venue
Journal of Animal Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-03
Volume
75
Issue
2
Pages
476-484
ISSN
  • 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2656
OpenAlex
W1542079723
Cited by
370
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 28
FWCI
11.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Animal Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Otago
  • National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research
  • McGill University
  • University of British Columbia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Keywords
neutral theory, niche theory, community similarity, dispersal limitation, species traits, dispersibility, local environmental conditions, stream macroinvertebrates, trophic levels, community assembly, spatial distance
MeSH terms
Animals, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Environment, Invertebrates, Models, Biological, Population Density, Population Dynamics, Species Specificity, Ecosystem, Biodiversity, Rivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review