The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A meta‐analysis of the traits affecting dispersal ability in butterflies: can wingspan be used as a proxy?
Open accessAbstract
Summary: 1. Dispersal ability of a species is a key ecological characteristic, affecting a range of processes from adaptation, community dynamics and genetic structure, to distribution and range size. It is determined by both intrinsic species traits and extrinsic landscape‐related properties. 2. Using butterflies as a model system, the following questions were addressed: (i) given similar extrinsic factors, which intrinsic species trait(s) explain dispersal ability? (ii) can one of these traits be used as a proxy for dispersal ability? (iii) the effect of interactions between the traits, and phylogenetic relatedness, on dispersal ability. 3. Four data sets, using different measures of dispersal, were compiled from published literature. The first data set uses mean dispersal distances from capture–mark–recapture studies, and the other three use mobility indices. Data for six traits that can potentially affect dispersal ability were collected: wingspan, larval host plant specificity, adult habitat specificity, mate location strategy, voltinism and flight period duration. Each data set was subjected to both unifactorial, and multifactorial, phylogenetically controlled analyses. 4. Among the factors considered, wingspan was the most important determinant of dispersal ability, although the predictive powers of regression models were low. Voltinism and flight period duration also affect dispersal ability, especially in case of temperate species. Interactions between the factors did not affect dispersal ability, and phylogenetic relatedness was significant in one data set. 5. While using wingspan as the only proxy for dispersal ability maybe problematic, it is usually the only easily accessible species‐specific trait for a large number of species. It can thus be a satisfactory proxy when carefully interpreted, especially for analyses involving many species from all across the world.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language
Paradis, E., Claude, J., & Strimmer, K. (2004) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412 · Cited by 11,335
nlme : Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models
DebRoy, S. (2006) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,009
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists
Nakagawa, S., & Cuthill, I. C. (2007) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2007.00027.x · Cited by 3,835
Bowler, D. E., & Benton, T. G. (2005) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793104006645 · Cited by 1,904
Martins, E. P., & Hansen, T. F. (1997) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/286013 · Cited by 1,711
Hansen, T. F., & Martins, E. P. (1996) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03914.x · Cited by 504
Characteristics of insect populations on habitat fragments: A mini review
Tscharntke, T., Steffan‐Dewenter, I., Kruess, A., & Thies, C. (2002) · Ecological Research · doi:10.1046/j.1440-1703.2002.00482.x · Cited by 501
Öckinger, E., Schweiger, O., Crist, T. O., Debinski, D. M., Krauss, J., Kuussaari, M., Petersen, J. D., Pöyry, J., Settele, J., Summerville, K. S., et al. (2010) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01487.x · Cited by 476 · cited 8×
“Öckinger et al. (2010) showed that species with low mobility, a narrow feeding niche and low reproduction were most strongly affected by habitat loss; this is illustrated by the higher rate of decline among specialist butterflies of grassland (c. 19%), wetlands (c. 15”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Landscape simplification filters species traits and drives biotic homogenization
Gámez-Virués, S., Perović, D. J., Gossner, M. M., Börschig, C., Blüthgen, N., de Jong, H., Simons, N. K., Klein, A.-M., Krauss, J., Maier, G., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms9568 · Cited by 666
Ecological drivers of global gradients in avian dispersal inferred from wing morphology
Sheard, C., Neate-Clegg, M. H. C., Alioravainen, N., Jones, S. E. I., Vincent, C., MacGregor, H. E. A., Bregman, T. P., Claramunt, S., & Tobias, J. A. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16313-6 · Cited by 435
Börschig, C., Klein, A.-M., von Wehrden, H., & Krauss, J. (2013) · Basic and Applied Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.baae.2013.09.002 · Cited by 172
Contrasting effects of habitat area and connectivity on evenness of pollinator communities
Marini, L., Öckinger, E., Bergman, K., Jauker, B., Krauss, J., Kuussaari, M., Pöyry, J., Smith, H. G., Steffan‐Dewenter, I., & Bommarco, R. (2014) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00369.x · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Sekar, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-10-11
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 174-184
- ISSN
- 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2656
- OpenAlex
- W1530724714
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 6.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A meta‐analysis of the traits affecting dispersal ability in butterflies: can wingspan be used as a proxy? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01909.x
- The paper
- Sekar, S. (2012). A meta‐analysis of the traits affecting dispersal ability in butterflies: can wingspan be used as a proxy? Journal of Animal Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01909.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.