Can we use the young : female ratio to infer ungulate population dynamics? An empirical test using red deer Cervus elaphus as a model
Abstract
Summary Management decisions for exploited species often rely on count ratios, such as the young to adult female ratio as a proxy of birth rate, and the decrease in the ratio between yearling and females in yeart+ 1 and the young : female ratio in yeartto obtain juvenile survival. However, the reliability of such estimates has yet to be demonstrated. We investigated the consistency of the young to female ratio method by using observations on individually marked female red deer. These females were known to have raised their calves to weaning successfully. We compared temporal variation in the proportion of females with a calf at heel from count ratios with the probability of observing a calf with its mother from marked animals. The proportion of females observed with a calf at heel decreased over time (from 0·43 early May to 0·15 early March). This measure was influenced by individual variation and by interactive effects of year and habitat type, although there was no direct relationship with the density of vegetation cover. The proportion of females seen with a calf at heel assessed from counts did not correspond with the probability of observing a female with a calf at heel, given that she successfully weaned a calf in autumn (estimated from direct observation). The probability of observing a female with a calf was highest in September (0·4) prior to the rut and lowest just after the birth season (0·08) and during the rut (0·18). The temporal pattern in the probability of ob…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Age ratios are more reliable in open habitats characteristic of the study area.
“they are more reliable in the open habitats characteristic of our study area (Bonenfant et al. 2005)”
From Animal migration amid shifting patterns of phenology and predation: lessons from a Yellowstone elk herd (2013) · cites this paper as Bonenfant et al. 2005
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 73 · Cited by 80
- Authors
- BONENFANT, C., GAILLARD, J., KLEIN, F., & HAMANN, J.
- Affiliations
- Lyon 1 Université (FR)
- Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage (FR)
- Corresponding author
- BONENFANT, CHRISTOPHE
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03-14
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 361-370
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2664
- OpenAlex
- W1519014249
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Ecology (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Keywords
- red deer, ungulate population dynamics, juvenile survival, pregnancy rate, weaning, density dependence, habitat type effects, population monitoring
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review