Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 416

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differential effects of landscape and management on diversity and density of ground‐dwelling farmland spiders

Open access
SCHMIDT, MARTIN H., ROSCHEWITZ, INDRA, THIES, CARSTEN, TSCHARNTKE, TEJA·2005·Journal of Applied Ecology

Abstract

Summary: The distribution and abundance of animals are influenced by factors at both local and wider landscape scales. Natural enemies of pests in arable fields often immigrate from the surrounding landscape, and are also influenced by local management practices. Thus, landscape diversification and farming methods may both enhance farmland biodiversity, but their relative roles and possible interactions have been little explored. The relationships of ground‐dwelling spiders (Araneae) to landscape features and to organic agriculture were studied in 12 pairs of organic vs. conventional fields of winter wheat Triticum aestivum along a gradient of landscape complexity. High percentages of non‐crop habitats in the landscape increased local species richness of spiders from 12 to 20 species, irrespective of local management. This indicates that larger species pools are sustained in complex landscapes, where there is higher availability of refuge and overwintering habitats. Organic agriculture did not increase the number of spider species, but enhanced spider density by 62%. Additionally, spider density was positively related to the percentage of non‐crop habitats in the surrounding landscape, but only in conventional fields. Synthesis and applications. The species richness of ground‐dwelling spiders in crop fields was linked to large‐scale landscape complexity, while spider densities responded to local management practices. Organic agriculture benefits farmland spiders and augments the numbers of predatory spiders, thereby contributing to pest control. However, measures to conserve species richness must also take landscape‐scale factors into account. Complex landscapes including perennial non‐crop habitats should be preserved or restored to achieve high levels of spider diversity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01014.x

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Cited by

See all 416

Metadata

Authors
SCHMIDT, M. H., ROSCHEWITZ, I., THIES, C., & TSCHARNTKE, T.
Venue
Journal of Applied Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-04
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
281-287
ISSN
  • 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2664
OpenAlex
W1500701742
Cited by
416
References
50
FWCI
10.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential effects of landscape and management on diversity and density of ground‐dwelling farmland spiders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01014.x
The paper
SCHMIDT, M. H., ROSCHEWITZ, I., THIES, C., & TSCHARNTKE, T. (2005). Differential effects of landscape and management on diversity and density of ground‐dwelling farmland spiders. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01014.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.