The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ecologically justified charisma: preservation of top predators delivers biodiversity conservation
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Because of their popular appeal, top vertebrate predators have frequently been used as flagship or umbrella species to acquire financial support, raise environmental awareness and plan systems of protected areas. However, some have claimed that the utilization of charismatic predators may divert a disproportionate amount of funding to a few glamorous species without delivering broader biodiversity benefits, an accusation aggravated by the fact that the conservation of top predators is often complex, difficult and expensive. Therefore, tests are needed of whether apex predators may be employed to achieve ecosystem‐level targets. To test such a hypothesis, we compared the biodiversity values recorded at the breeding sites of six raptor species, differing widely in diet and habitat associations, with those observed at three types of control locations, (i) sites randomly chosen in comparable habitat, (ii) breeding sites of a randomly selected bird species of lower trophic level and (iii) breeding sites of a lower trophic level species with specialized ecological requirements. Biodiversity was measured as the richness and evenness of bird, butterfly and tree species. Biodiversity levels were consistently higher at sites occupied by top predators than at any of the three types of control sites. Furthermore, sites occupied by top predators also held greater densities of individual birds and butterflies (all species combined) than control sites. In a reserve‐selection simulation exercise, networks of protected sites constructed on the basis of top predators were more efficient than networks based on lower trophic level species, enabling higher biodiversity coverage to be achieved with a smaller number of reserves. Synthesis and applications. Our results provide evidence of a link between the strategic utilization of top predatory species and ecosystem‐level conservation. We suggest that, at least in some biological systems, conservation plans based on apex predators could be implemented to deliver broader biodiversity benefits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Parry, G. D. R., Johnson, M. S., Bell, R. M., Edwards, R. W., & Wathern, P. (1984) · Planning and Ecology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3045-3_3 · Cited by 7,591
Species diversity in space and time
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-2720 · Cited by 4,573
Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa
Cramp, S. (1977) · Cited by 3,275
(1992) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-03531-4 · Cited by 2,991
(1979) · Poyser eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781472597199 · Cited by 2,198
Population Limitation in Birds
(1998) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-517365-0.x5000-5 · Cited by 1,772
Post‐fire recovery of ant communities in Submediterranean Pinus nigra forests
Rodrigo, A., & Retana, J. (2006) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04272.x · Cited by 1,448
Birds in Europe: their conservation status
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-0930b · Cited by 1,308
Population limitation in birds
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-5684 · Cited by 1,200
Trophic Cascades in Terrestrial Systems: A Review of the Effects of Carnivore Removals on Plants
Schmitz, O. J., Hambäck, P. A., & Beckerman, A. P. (2000) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/303311 · Cited by 981
Cited by
Predator interactions, mesopredator release and biodiversity conservation.
Ritchie, E. G., & Johnson, C. N. (2009) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01347.x · Cited by 1,375
Top Predators as Conservation Tools: Ecological Rationale, Assumptions, and Efficacy
Sergio, F., Caro, T., Brown, D., Clucas, B., Hunter, J., Ketchum, J., McHugh, K., & Hiraldo, F. (2008) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173545 · Cited by 670
Self-citationTitley, M. A., Snaddon, J. L., & Turner, E. C. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0189577 · Cited by 328
Kohl, K. D., Coogan, S. C. P., & Raubenheimer, D. (2015) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201400171 · Cited by 125
LETNIC, M., & KOCH, F. (2010) · Austral Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2009.02022.x · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- SERGIO, F., NEWTON, I., MARCHESI, L., & PEDRINI, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-08-04
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1049-1055
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2664
- OpenAlex
- W2107261739
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 15.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecologically justified charisma: preservation of top predators delivers biodiversity conservation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01218.x
- The paper
- SERGIO, F., NEWTON, I., MARCHESI, L., & PEDRINI, P. (2006). Ecologically justified charisma: preservation of top predators delivers biodiversity conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01218.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.