Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 444

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A revised model for lipid‐normalizing δ13C values from aquatic organisms, with implications for isotope mixing models

KILJUNEN, MIKKO, GREY, JONATHAN, SINISALO, TUULA, HARROD, CHRIS, IMMONEN, HEMMO, JONES, ROGER I.·2006·Journal of Applied Ecology

Abstract

Summary: Stable isotope analyses coupled with mixing models are being used increasingly to evaluate ecological management issues and questions. Such applications of stable isotope analyses often require simultaneous carbon and nitrogen analyses from the same sample. Correction of the carbon isotope values to take account of the varying content of 13 C‐depleted lipids is then frequently achieved by a lipid‐normalization procedure using a model describing the relationship between change in δ 13 C following lipid removal and the original C:N ratio of a sample. We evaluated the applicability of two widely used normalization models using empirical data for muscle tissue from a wide range of fish and for aquatic invertebrates. Neither normalization model proved satisfactory, and we present some modifications that greatly improve the fit of one of the models to the fish muscle data. For invertebrates we found no clear relationship between change in δ 13 C following lipid removal and the original C:N ratio. We also examined the effect of lipid‐normalization on the output of a mixing model designed to calculate the proportional contribution of prey items to the diet of a consumer. Mixing model output was greatly influenced by whether prey or consumer values alone or together were lipid‐normalized and we urge caution in the interpretation of results from these models pending further experimental evidence. Synthesis and applications. We describe a revised lipid‐normalization model that should be applicable to a wide range of marine and freshwater fish species in studies applying stable isotope analyses to ecological management issues. However, we strongly advise against applying these kinds of lipid‐normalization models to aquatic invertebrate data. The interpretation of outputs from mixing models is greatly influenced by whether the carbon isotope data have been lipid‐normalized or not.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01224.x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 444

Metadata

Authors
KILJUNEN, M., GREY, J., SINISALO, T., HARROD, C., IMMONEN, H., & JONES, R. I.
Venue
Journal of Applied Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-09-12
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
1213-1222
ISSN
  • 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2664
OpenAlex
W1957310792
Cited by
444
References
27
FWCI
10.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A revised model for lipid‐normalizing δ13C values from aquatic organisms, with implications for isotope mixing models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01224.x
The paper
KILJUNEN, M., GREY, J., SINISALO, T., HARROD, C., IMMONEN, H., & JONES, R. I. (2006). A revised model for lipid‐normalizing δ13C values from aquatic organisms, with implications for isotope mixing models. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01224.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.