Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 201

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Seed dispersal and recruitment limitation are barriers to native recolonization of old‐fields in western Australia

STANDISH, R. J., CRAMER, V. A., WILD, S. L., HOBBS, R. J.·2007·Journal of Applied Ecology

Abstract

Summary: Native recolonization of abandoned farmland in the wheat‐growing region of western Australia is slow to non‐existent, even 45 years after abandonment. Instead, old‐fields tend to be dominated by non‐native annual grasses. The native vegetation in the region is highly fragmented. We predicted that recovery is limited by seed availability and recruitment failure. We compared the seed rain, soil seed bank and extant vegetation of three old‐fields and three adjacent native woodland remnants to test our predictions. Seed dispersal limitation was evident at two old‐fields: species richness of the native seed in the soil seed bank declined at 50‐m increments (i.e. 0 m, 50 m and 100 m) into the old‐fields. Species richness of recolonizing native vegetation also declined along this transect. Recruitment limitation was evident at one old‐field, probably linked to the few abundant non‐native species that dominated the vegetation. These non‐natives dominated the seed supply, and tended to germinate more rapidly than the native seeds. In contrast, seed dispersal and recruitment had not limited native recolonization of the third old‐field: 91% of the species present in the adjacent remnant had recolonized this old‐field. Species richness and abundance of non‐natives in the seed supply and extant vegetation were minor compared with that of the other old‐fields. Therefore an adequate seed supply of natives, the lack of non‐natives and chance natural disturbance events (i.e. cyclone and fire) had probably contributed to this result. Synthesis and applications. Native recolonization of wheatbelt old‐fields is contingent upon the unusual coincidence of seed availability, favourable conditions for recruitment and an absence of competitive non‐natives. Grasses, annual herbs and Acacia shrubs are dominant among the few native species that have consistently recolonized these old‐fields. In most cases, direct seeding and control of non‐natives are the minimum requirements for restoration of wheatbelt old‐fields to species‐rich eucalypt woodlands.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01262.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 201

Metadata

Authors
STANDISH, R. J., CRAMER, V. A., WILD, S. L., & HOBBS, R. J.
Venue
Journal of Applied Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-02-19
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
435-445
ISSN
  • 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2664
OpenAlex
W1492038667
Cited by
201
References
1
FWCI
9.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seed dispersal and recruitment limitation are barriers to native recolonization of old‐fields in western Australia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01262.x
The paper
STANDISH, R. J., CRAMER, V. A., WILD, S. L., & HOBBS, R. J. (2007). Seed dispersal and recruitment limitation are barriers to native recolonization of old‐fields in western Australia. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01262.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.