The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Remote sensing‐based predictors improve distribution models of rare, early successional and broadleaf tree species in Utah
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Compared to bioclimatic variables, remote sensing predictors are rarely used for predictive species modelling. When used, the predictors represent typically habitat classifications or filters rather than gradual spectral, surface or biophysical properties. Consequently, the full potential of remotely sensed predictors for modelling the spatial distribution of species remains unexplored. Here we analysed the partial contributions of remotely sensed and climatic predictor sets to explain and predict the distribution of 19 tree species in Utah. We also tested how these partial contributions were related to characteristics such as successional types or species traits. We developed two spatial predictor sets of remotely sensed and topo‐climatic variables to explain the distribution of tree species. We used variation partitioning techniques applied to generalized linear models to explore the combined and partial predictive powers of the two predictor sets. Non‐parametric tests were used to explore the relationships between the partial model contributions of both predictor sets and species characteristics. More than 60% of the variation explained by the models represented contributions by one of the two partial predictor sets alone, with topo‐climatic variables outperforming the remotely sensed predictors. However, the partial models derived from only remotely sensed predictors still provided high model accuracies, indicating a significant correlation between climate and remote sensing variables. The overall accuracy of the models was high, but small sample sizes had a strong effect on cross‐validated accuracies for rare species. Models of early successional and broadleaf species benefited significantly more from adding remotely sensed predictors than did late seral and needleleaf species. The core‐satellite species types differed significantly with respect to overall model accuracies. Models of satellite and urban species, both with low prevalence, benefited more from use of remotely sensed predictors than did the more frequent core species. Synthesis and applications. If carefully prepared, remotely sensed variables are useful additional predictors for the spatial distribution of trees. Major improvements resulted for deciduous, early successional, satellite and rare species. The ability to improve model accuracy for species having markedly different life history strategies is a crucial step for assessing effects of global change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models
FIELDING, A. H., & BELL, J. F. (1997) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892997000088 · Cited by 6,956
Hutchinson, G. E. (1957) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.1957.022.01.039 · Cited by 6,228
Cited by
Review of studies on tree species classification from remotely sensed data
Fassnacht, F. E., Latifi, H., Stereńczak, K., Modzelewska, A., Lefsky, M., Waser, L. T., Straub, C., & Ghosh, A. (2016) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2016.08.013 · Cited by 1,068
Habitat suitability modelling and niche theory
Hirzel, A. H., & Le Lay, G. (2008) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01524.x · Cited by 873
Extinction risk and threats to plants and fungi
Nic Lughadha, E., Bachman, S. P., Leão, T. C. C., Forest, F., Halley, J. M., Moat, J., Acedo, C., Bacon, K. L., Brewer, R. F. A., Gâteblé, G., et al. (2020) · PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET · doi:10.1002/ppp3.10146 · Cited by 451
What we use is not what we know: environmental predictors in plant distribution models
Mod, H. K., Scherrer, D., Luoto, M., & Guisan, A. (2016) · Journal of Vegetation Science · doi:10.1111/jvs.12444 · Cited by 265
Climate, competition and connectivity affect future migration and ranges of European trees
Meier, E. S., Lischke, H., Schmatz, D. R., & Zimmermann, N. E. (2012) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00669.x · Cited by 259
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- ZIMMERMANN, N. E., EDWARDS, T. C., MOISEN, G. G., FRESCINO, T. S., & BLACKARD, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-07-23
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1057-1067
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2664
- OpenAlex
- W2124155637
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Remote sensing‐based predictors improve distribution models of rare, early successional and broadleaf tree species in Utah. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01348.x
- The paper
- ZIMMERMANN, N. E., EDWARDS, T. C., MOISEN, G. G., FRESCINO, T. S., & BLACKARD, J. A. (2007). Remote sensing‐based predictors improve distribution models of rare, early successional and broadleaf tree species in Utah. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01348.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.