The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Can oil palm plantations be made more hospitable for forest butterflies and birds?
Open accessAbstract
1 Rising global demand for palm oil is likely to exacerbate deforestation rates in oil palm-producing countries. This will lead to a net reduction in biodiversity unless measures can be taken to improve the value of oil palm plantations. 2 Here, I investigate whether the biodiversity of oil palm plantations can be increased by determining how forest-dwelling butterflies and birds in these plantations are affected by vegetation characteristics at the local level (e.g. epiphyte prevalence) and by natural forest cover at the landscape level (e.g. old-growth forests surrounding oil palm estates). 3 Across transects, vegetation variables explained 0–1·2% of the variation in butterfly species richness and 0–7% of that in bird species richness. The most important predictors of species richness across transects were percentage ground cover of weeds for butterflies; and epiphyte prevalence and presence of leguminous crops for birds. Across estates, natural forest cover explained 1·2–12·9% of the variation in butterfly species richness and 0·6–53·3% of variation in bird species richness. The most important predictors of species richness across estates were percentage cover of old-growth forests surrounding an estate for butterflies; and percentage cover of young secondary forests surrounding an estate for birds. 4 Synthesis and applications. In order to maximize biodiversity in oil palm plantations, oil palm companies and local governments should work together to preserve as much of the remaining natural forests as possible by, for example, creating forested buffer zones around oil palm estates or protecting remnant forest patches in the landscape.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comparative losses of British butterflies, birds, and plants and the global extinction crisis
Thomas, J. A., Telfer, M. G., Roy, D. B., Preston, C. D., Greenwood, J. J. D., Asher, J., Fox, R., Clarke, R. T., & Lawton, J. H. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1095046 · Cited by 955
Cited by
Navjot's nightmare revisited: logging, agriculture, and biodiversity in Southeast Asia
Wilcove, D. S., Giam, X., Edwards, D. P., Fisher, B., & Koh, L. P. (2013) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2013.04.005 · Cited by 506
Self-citationConserving Southeast Asian forest biodiversity in human-modified landscapes
Sodhi, N. S., Koh, L. P., Clements, R., Wanger, T. C., Hill, J. K., Hamer, K. C., Clough, Y., Tscharntke, T., Posa, M. R. C., & Lee, T. M. (2010) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.12.029 · Cited by 386
Self-citationA review of the ecosystem functions in oil palm plantations, using forests as a reference system
Dislich, C., Keyel, A. C., Salecker, J., Kisel, Y., Meyer, K. M., Auliya, M., Barnes, A. D., Corre, M. D., Darras, K., Faust, H., et al. (2017) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12295 · Cited by 373
Northrup, J. M., & Wittemyer, G. (2013) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12009 · Cited by 286
The ecological impact of biofuels
Fargione, J. E., Plevin, R. J., & Hill, J. D. (2010) · Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144720 · Cited by 260
Metadata
- Authors
- Koh, L. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-07-09
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1002-1009
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2664
- OpenAlex
- W1998414968
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Can oil palm plantations be made more hospitable for forest butterflies and birds? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01491.x
- The paper
- Koh, L. P. (2008). Can oil palm plantations be made more hospitable for forest butterflies and birds? Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01491.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.