The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Do changes in the frequency, magnitude and timing of extreme climatic events threaten the population viability of coastal birds?
Open accessAbstract
Summary: 1. Climate change encompasses changes in both the means and the extremes of climatic variables, but the population consequences of the latter are intrinsically difficult to study. 2. We investigated whether the frequency, magnitude and timing of rare but catastrophic flooding events have changed over time in Europe’s largest estuary. Subsequently, we quantified how this has affected the flooding risk of six saltmarsh nesting bird species. 3. We show that maximum high tide has increased twice as fast as mean high tide over the past four decades (0·8 vs. 0·4 cm year−1), resulting in more frequent and more catastrophic flooding of nests, especially around the time when most eggs have just hatched. 4. Using data on species’ nest elevations, on their timing of egg‐laying and on the duration that their eggs and chicks are at risk from flooding, we show that flooding risks increased for all six studied species (even after accounting for compensatory land accretion) and this is expected to worsen in the near future if they do not adapt. Moreover, our study provides the first evidence that increasing flooding risks have reduced the reproductive output below stable population levels in at least one species, the Eurasian oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus. 5. Sensitivity analyses show that currently birds would benefit most from adapting their nest‐site selection to higher areas. However, historically the lower marsh has been favoured for its proximity to the feeding grounds and for its low vegetation aiding predator detection. 6. Synthesis and application s. We argue that it is more difficult for birds to infer that habitat quality has decreased from changes in the frequency of rare and unpredictable extreme events than from trends in climatic means. Consequently, at present the lower parts of the saltmarsh may function as an ecological trap. The creation of new (i.e. low) saltmarshes – currently a restoration priority – may thus counteract the goal of increasing the avian biodiversity of an area. Management tools to mitigate the effects of climate change, either by making the higher saltmarsh more attractive (mowing, predator control) or by reducing the flooding risk of the lower marsh (building elevated plots), await to be tested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Plaschke, S., Bulla, M., Cruz-López, M., Gómez del Ángel, S., & Küpper, C. (2019) · Frontiers in Zoology · doi:10.1186/s12983-019-0313-1 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Van De Pol, M., Ens, B. J., Heg, D., Brouwer, L., Krol, J., Maier, M., Exo, K., Oosterbeek, K., Lok, T., Eising, C. M., & Koffijberg, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-06-29
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 720-730
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2664
- OpenAlex
- W2136306080
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do changes in the frequency, magnitude and timing of extreme climatic events threaten the population viability of coastal birds? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01842.x
- The paper
- Van De Pol, M., Ens, B. J., Heg, D., Brouwer, L., Krol, J., Maier, M., Exo, K., Oosterbeek, K., Lok, T., Eising, C. M., & Koffijberg, K. (2010). Do changes in the frequency, magnitude and timing of extreme climatic events threaten the population viability of coastal birds? Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01842.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.