Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 220

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of land use at a landscape scale on bumblebee nest density and survival

Open access
Goulson, Dave, Lepais, Olivier, O’Connor, Stephanie, Osborne, Juliet L., Sanderson, Roy A., Cussans, John, Goffe, Louis, Darvill, Ben·2010·Journal of Applied Ecology

Abstract

Summary: 1. We have little idea how landscape‐scale factors influence the success of wild bumblebee nests over time. Here for the first time we use molecular markers to estimate within‐season changes in the numbers of nests. 2. Workers of two bumblebee species were sampled in an arable landscape in late May–June and late July–August, and the numbers of nests represented in each sample were estimated. We compare the methods available to estimate nest number from such samples and conclude that methods which allow for heterogeneity in the probability of capture of nests provide the best fit to our data. Changes in numbers of nests at the two time points were used to infer nest survival. 3. The two bee species appeared to differ markedly in survival over time, with estimates of 45% of nests surviving for Bombus lapidarius and 91% for B. pascuorum. However, our data suggest that the foraging range of B. pascuorum may be greater in late season, which would lead us to overestimate nest survival in this species. Differential survival may also reflect differences in phenology between the two species. 4. The land use class which had the most consistent effects on nest number and survival was gardens; for B. lapidarius, the area of gardens within a 750 and 1000 m radius positively influenced nest survival, while for B. pascuorum, the number of nests in late samples was higher at sites with more gardens within a 500 and 750‐m radius. For B. pascuorum, the area of grassland within a 250 and 500‐m radius also positively influenced nest number in late samples, probably because this is the preferred nesting habitat for this species. 5. The importance of gardens is in accordance with previous studies which suggest that they now provide a stronghold for bumblebees in an otherwise impoverished agricultural environment; furthermore, our data suggest that the positive influence of gardens on bumblebee populations can spill over at least 1 km into surrounding farmland. 6. Synthesis and applications. The substantial effects that even small areas of local resources such as rough grassland or clover leys can have on bumblebee nest numbers and survival is of clear relevance for the design of pollinator management strategies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01872.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 220

Metadata

Authors
Goulson, D., Lepais, O., O’Connor, S., Osborne, J. L., Sanderson, R. A., Cussans, J., Goffe, L., & Darvill, B.
Venue
Journal of Applied Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-09-21
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
1207-1215
ISSN
  • 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2664
OpenAlex
W2157817580
Cited by
220
References
2
FWCI
14.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of land use at a landscape scale on bumblebee nest density and survival. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01872.x
The paper
Goulson, D., Lepais, O., O’Connor, S., Osborne, J. L., Sanderson, R. A., Cussans, J., Goffe, L., & Darvill, B. (2010). Effects of land use at a landscape scale on bumblebee nest density and survival. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01872.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.