Cited by 163Bee Products Chemical AnalysisEssential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityHealthcare and Venom Research

Antibacterial and free-radical scavenging activities of Sonoran propolis: Biological activity of Sonoran propolis

Velazquez, C., Navarro, M., Acosta, A., Angulo, A., Dominguez, Z., Robles, R., Robles-Zepeda, R., Lugo, E. +4 more·2007·Journal of Applied Microbiology

Abstract

Aims To evaluate the antibacterial and free-radical scavenging (FRS) activities of propolis collected from three different areas of Sonoran Desert in northwestern Mexico [Pueblo de Alamos (PAP), Ures (UP) and Caborca (CP)]. Methods and results The antibacterial and FRS activities of Sonoran propolis were determined by the broth microdilution method and the DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydracyl) assay, respectively. Propolis samples had antibacterial activity against only Gram-positive bacteria. The UP sample showed the highest antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus [minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) 100 microg ml(-1)] in a concentration-dependent manner (UP > CP > PAP). Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), a UP propolis constituent, had very high growth-inhibitory activity towards Gram-positive bacteria, particularly against S. aureus (MIC 0.1 mmol l(-1)). To our knowledge, this is the first study showing a strong antibacterial activity of CAPE against S. aureus. Additionally, propolis CP exhibited high FRS activity (86% +/- 0.3 at 100 microg ml(-1)) comparable with those of the reference antioxidants vitamin C (87.4% +/- 1.7 at 70 micromol l(-1)) and BHT (66.07% +/- 0.76 at 140 micromol l(-1)). The propolis compounds CAPE and rutin showed high FRS activity (90.4% +/- 0.2 and 88.5% +/- 0.8 at 70 micromol l(-1), respectively). Conclusions Sonoran propolis UP and CAPE had strong antibacterial activity against S. aureus. In addition, propolis CP showed potent FR…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03409.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Velazquez, C., Navarro, M., Acosta, A., Angulo, A., Dominguez, Z., Robles, R., Robles-Zepeda, R., Lugo, E., Goycoolea, F. M., Velazquez, E. F., Astiazaran, H., & Hernandez, J.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Sonora (MX)
  • Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo (MX)
Venue
Journal of Applied Microbiology
Published
2007-06-19
Volume
103
Issue
5
Pages
1747-1756
ISSN
1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1503082553
Cited by
163
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Bee Products Chemical Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Healthcare and Venom Research
Keywords
propolis, Sonoran Desert, antibacterial activity, free radical scavenging, antioxidant activity, Staphylococcus aureus, caffeic acid phenethyl ester, rutin, Gram-positive bacteria, bee products, DPPH assay
MeSH terms
Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Antioxidants, Ascorbic Acid, Bees, Butylated Hydroxytoluene, Caffeic Acids, Food Microbiology, Gram-Positive Bacteria, Mexico, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Phenylethyl Alcohol, Phenols, Propolis, Rutin, Staphylococcus aureus, Vitamins, Free Radical Scavengers, Flavonols, Flavones

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review