The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Isolation and characterization of antagonistic Bacillus subtilis strains from the avocado rhizoplane displaying biocontrol activity
Abstract
AIM: This study was undertaken to isolate Bacillus subtilis strains with biological activity against soil-borne phytopathogenic fungi from the avocado rhizoplane. METHODS AND RESULTS: A collection of 905 bacterial isolates obtained from the rhizoplane of healthy avocado trees, contains 277 gram-positive isolates. From these gram-positive isolates, four strains, PCL1605, PCL1608, PCL1610 and PCL1612, identified as B. subtilis, were selected on the basis of their antifungal activity against diverse soil-borne phytopathogenic fungi. Analysis of the antifungal compounds involved in their antagonistic activity showed that these strains produced hydrolytic enzymes such as glucanases or proteases and the antibiotic lipopeptides surfactin, fengycin, and/or iturin A. In biocontrol trials using the pathosystems tomato/Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. radicis-lycopersici and avocado/Rosellinia necatrix, two B. subtilis strains, PCL1608 and PCL1612, both producing iturin A, exhibited the highest biocontrol and colonization capabilities. CONCLUSIONS: Diverse antagonistic B. subtilis strains isolated from healthy avocado rhizoplanes have shown promising biocontrol abilities, which are closely linked with the production of antifungal lipopeptides and good colonization aptitudes. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This is one of the few reports dealing with isolation and characterization of B. subtilis strains with biocontrol activity against the common soil-borne phytopathogenic fungi F. oxysporum f.sp. radicis-lycopersici and R. necatrix.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bacillus subtilis: A plant-growth promoting rhizobacterium that also impacts biotic stress
Hashem, A., Tabassum, B., & Fathi Abd_Allah, E. (2019) · Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.05.004 · Cited by 962
Bacillus for Plant Growth Promotion and Stress Resilience: What Have We Learned?
Tsotetsi, T., Nephali, L., Malebe, M., & Tugizimana, F. (2022) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants11192482 · Cited by 222
Mora, I., Cabrefiga, J., & Montesinos, E. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127738 · Cited by 129
Abuhena, M., Al-Rashid, J., Azim, M. F., Khan, M. N. M., Kabir, M. G., Barman, N. C., Rasul, N. M., Akter, S., & Huq, M. A. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-15366-5 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Cazorla, F. M., Romero, D., Pérez-García, A., Lugtenberg, B. J. J., Vicente, A. D., & Bloemberg, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Microbiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-06-21
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1950-1959
- ISSN
- 1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2106110917
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.