The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Free radical scavenging activity of Lactobacillus fermentum in vitro and its antioxidative effect on growing-finishing pigs: Antioxidative characteristics of Lactobacillus fermentum
Abstract
AIMS: To evaluate the free radical-scavenging capacity of Lactobacillus fermentum and its effects on antioxidant enzyme levels in finishing pigs. METHODS AND RESULTS: The free radical-scavenging activity of Lact. fermentum was analysed in vitro. The tested Lactobacillus showed a high scavenging ability against DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl), superoxide and hydroxyl radicals which was dose dependent. Subsequently, 108 crossbred pigs weighing 20.67 BW, were allotted to dietary treatments including a basal diet or the basal diet supplemented with either aureomycin or 10.2 x 10(7) Lact. fermentum CFU g(-1) diet. Supplementation of Lact. fermentum increased total antioxidant capacity (P < 0.01) in serum from 50 kg pigs, while serum superoxide dismutase (P = 0.01) and glutathione peroxidase (P < 0.01) increased, and malondialdehyde levels decreased (P < 0.01) in 90 kg pigs. Hepatic catalase (P = 0.04), muscle superoxide dismutase (P < 0.01) and copper-zinc-superoxide dismutase were enhanced (P = 0.01), whereas malondialdehyde levels were reduced (P = 0.05) by Lact. fermentum. CONCLUSIONS: The free radical-scavenging capacity of Lact. fermentum was dose dependent and its supplementation improved the antioxidant status of pigs. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Lactobacillus fermentum could be used to alleviate oxidative stress and increase pig performance and improve pork quality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Feng, T., & Wang, J. (2020) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.1080/19490976.2020.1801944 · Cited by 621
Zhang, J., Zhao, X., Jiang, Y., Zhao, W., Guo, T., Cao, Y., Teng, J., Hao, X., Zhao, J., & Yang, Z. (2017) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2016-12480 · Cited by 141
Beneficial properties of lactic acid bacteria naturally present in dairy production
Colombo, M., Castilho, N. P. A., Todorov, S. D., & Nero, L. A. (2018) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/s12866-018-1356-8 · Cited by 113
Selenium-Enriched Probiotics Improves Murine Male Fertility Compromised by High Fat Diet
Ibrahim, H. A. M., Zhu, Y., Wu, C., Lu, C., Ezekwe, M. O., Liao, S. F., & Haung, K. (2012) · Biological Trace Element Research · doi:10.1007/s12011-011-9308-2 · Cited by 62
In vitro Antioxidant Potential of Cell Free Supernatant of Probiotic Bacteria
Bharti, V., Mehta, A., Kumar Mourya, G., & Ahirwal, L. (2016) · Food & Pharma International · doi:10.5530/fpi.1.4.4 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, A. N., Yi, X. W., Yu, H. F., Dong, B., & Qiao, S. Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Microbiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-03-30
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1140-1148
- ISSN
- 1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1960619495
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Free radical scavenging activity of Lactobacillus fermentum in vitro and its antioxidative effect on growing-finishing pigs: Antioxidative characteristics of Lactobacillus fermentum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04294.x
- The paper
- Wang, A. N., Yi, X. W., Yu, H. F., Dong, B., & Qiao, S. Y. (2009). Free radical scavenging activity of Lactobacillus fermentum in vitro and its antioxidative effect on growing-finishing pigs: Antioxidative characteristics of Lactobacillus fermentum. Journal of Applied Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04294.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.