Cited by 8Antimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusVeterinary medicine and infectious diseasesDermatology and Skin Diseases

Development of a skin colonization model in gnotobiotic piglets for the study of the microbial ecology of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398

Open access
Giotis, E.S., Loeffler, A., Knight-Jones, T., Lloyd, D.H.·2012·Journal of Applied Microbiology

Abstract

AIMS: Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) ST398 continues to spread amongst pigs and other domestic animals and man. This highlights the need for models to examine MRSA colonization and investigate control strategies. This study aimed to develop a gnotobiotic pig model and assess the potential of bacterial interference from selected coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) against MRSA ST398. METHODS AND RESULTS: Groups of 2-week-old piglets were atraumatically inoculated either with MRSA and/or CNS. Skin and mucosae were swabbed, and bacterial counts compared over a period of 21 days. Piglets developed healthily, and bacterial populations increased similarly for both MRSA and CNS until day 32. On day 37, MRSA counts in groups with CNS reduced significantly compared with MRSA alone (P = 0·03). CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that inoculation of piglet skin with MRSA resulted in spontaneous colonization and that MRSA ST398 has a low pathogenic potential in gnotobiotic piglets. Quantitative bacteriology indicated that initial MRSA colonization was unaffected by concurrent CNS colonization but that interference may occur over a longer period. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Gnotobiotic piglets provide a reproducible model suitable for bacterial interference studies, which should be further explored as an alternative to antimicrobials in the control of MRSA.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05397.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Porcine skin serves as an excellent model for studies of wound healing, infection, and skin colonization.

    “In light of the similarities to human skin, porcine skin serves as an excellent model for studies of wound healing, infection, and skin colonization (15–18, 25).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Giotis, E. S., Loeffler, A., Knight-Jones, T., & Lloyd, D. H.
Affiliations
  • Royal Veterinary College (GB)
  • The Pirbright Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Loeffler, A.
Venue
Journal of Applied Microbiology
Published
2012-08-21
Volume
113
Issue
4
Pages
992-1000
ISSN
1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131657776
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RVC Research Online (Royal Veterinary College) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary medicine and infectious diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Keywords
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, ST398, gnotobiotic pigs, skin colonization, coagulase-negative staphylococci, bacterial interference, antimicrobial alternatives, pigs, MRSA control, animal models
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Germ-Free Life, Staphylococcal Infections, Skin Diseases, Bacterial, Sus scrofa, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Bacterial Load

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review