Development of a skin colonization model in gnotobiotic piglets for the study of the microbial ecology of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398
Open accessAbstract
AIMS: Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) ST398 continues to spread amongst pigs and other domestic animals and man. This highlights the need for models to examine MRSA colonization and investigate control strategies. This study aimed to develop a gnotobiotic pig model and assess the potential of bacterial interference from selected coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) against MRSA ST398. METHODS AND RESULTS: Groups of 2-week-old piglets were atraumatically inoculated either with MRSA and/or CNS. Skin and mucosae were swabbed, and bacterial counts compared over a period of 21 days. Piglets developed healthily, and bacterial populations increased similarly for both MRSA and CNS until day 32. On day 37, MRSA counts in groups with CNS reduced significantly compared with MRSA alone (P = 0·03). CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that inoculation of piglet skin with MRSA resulted in spontaneous colonization and that MRSA ST398 has a low pathogenic potential in gnotobiotic piglets. Quantitative bacteriology indicated that initial MRSA colonization was unaffected by concurrent CNS colonization but that interference may occur over a longer period. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Gnotobiotic piglets provide a reproducible model suitable for bacterial interference studies, which should be further explored as an alternative to antimicrobials in the control of MRSA.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Porcine skin serves as an excellent model for studies of wound healing, infection, and skin colonization.
“In light of the similarities to human skin, porcine skin serves as an excellent model for studies of wound healing, infection, and skin colonization (15–18, 25).”
From Candida auris Forms High-Burden Biofilms in Skin Niche Conditions and on Porcine Skin (2020) · cites this paper as [25]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Candida auris Forms High-Burden Biofilms in Skin Niche Conditions and on Porcine Skin
Horton, M. V., Johnson, C. J., Kernien, J. F., Patel, T. D., Lam, B. C., Cheong, J. Z. A., Meudt, J. J., Shanmuganayagam, D., Kalan, L. R., & Nett, J. E. (2020) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00910-19 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
- Authors
- Giotis, E. S., Loeffler, A., Knight-Jones, T., & Lloyd, D. H.
- Affiliations
- Royal Veterinary College (GB)
- The Pirbright Institute (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Loeffler, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Microbiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-08-21
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 992-1000
- ISSN
- 1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131657776
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RVC Research Online (Royal Veterinary College) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary medicine and infectious diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
- Keywords
- methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, ST398, gnotobiotic pigs, skin colonization, coagulase-negative staphylococci, bacterial interference, antimicrobial alternatives, pigs, MRSA control, animal models
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Germ-Free Life, Staphylococcal Infections, Skin Diseases, Bacterial, Sus scrofa, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Bacterial Load
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review