The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Expansion of human settlement in Kenya's Maasai Mara: what future for pastoralism and wildlife?
Abstract
Aim Wildlife and pastoral peoples have lived side‐by‐side in the Mara ecosystem of south‐western Kenya for at least 2000 years. Recent changes in human population and landuse are jeopardizing this co‐existence. The aim of the study is to determine the viability of pastoralism and wildlife conservation in Maasai ranches around the Maasai Mara National Reserve (MMNR). Location A study area of 2250 km 2 was selected in the northern part of the Serengeti‐Mara ecosystem, encompassing group ranches adjoining the MMNR. Emphasis is placed on Koyake Group Ranch, a rangeland area owned by Maasai pastoralists, and one of Kenya's major wildlife tourism areas. Methods Maasai settlement patterns, vegetation, livestock numbers and wildlife numbers were analysed over a 50‐year period. Settlement distributions and vegetation changes were determined from aerial photography and aerial surveys of 1950, 1961, 1967, 1974, 1983 and 1999. Livestock and wildlife numbers were determined from re‐analysis of systematic reconnaissance flights conducted by the Kenya Government from 1977 to 2000, and from ground counts in 2002. Corroborating data on livestock numbers were obtained from aerial photography of Maasai settlements in 2001. Trends in livestock were related to rainfall, and to vegetation production as indicated by the seasonal Normalized Difference Vegetation Index. With these data sets, per capita livestock holdings were determined for the period 1980–2000, a period of fluctuating rainfall and primary production. Results For the first half of the twentieth century, the Mara was infested with tsetse‐flies, and the Maasai were confined to the Lemek Valley area to the north of the MMNR. During the early 1960s, active tsetse‐control measures by both government and the Maasai led to the destruction of woodlands across the Mara and the retreat of tsetse flies. The Maasai were then able to expand their settlement area south towards MMNR. Meanwhile, wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus) from the increasing Serengeti population began to spill into the Mara rangelands each dry season, leading to direct competition between livestock and wildlife. Group ranches were established in the area in 1970 to formalize land tenure for the Maasai. By the late 1980s, with rapid population growth, new settlement areas had been established at Talek and other parts adjacent to the MMNR. Over the period 1983–99, the number of Maasai bomas in Koyake has increased at 6.4% per annum (pa), and the human population at 4.4% pa. Over the same period, cattle numbers on Koyake varied from 20,000 to 45,000 (average 25,000), in relation to total rainfall received over the previous 2 years. The rangelands of the Mara cannot support a greater cattle population under current pastoral practices. Conclusions With the rapid increase in human settlement in the Mara, and with imminent land privatization, it is probable that wildlife populations on Koyake will decline significantly in the next 3–5 years. Per capita livestock holdings on the ranch have now fallen to three livestock units/reference adult, well below minimum pastoral subsistence requirements. During the 1980s and 90s the Maasai diversified their livelihoods to generate revenues from tourism, small‐scale agriculture and land‐leases for mechanized cultivation. However, there is a massive imbalance in tourism incomes in favour of a small elite. In 1999 the membership of Koyake voted to subdivide the ranch into individual holdings. In 2003 the subdivision survey allocated plots of 60 ha average size to 1020 ranch members. This land privatization may result in increased cultivation and fencing, the exclusion of wildlife, and the decline of tourism as a revenue generator. This unique pastoral/wildlife system will shortly be lost unless land holdings can be managed to maintain the free movement of livestock and wildlife.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Serengeti: Dynamics of an Ecosystem.
Yalden, D. W., Sinclair, A. R. E., & Norton-Griffiths, M. (1980) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2259478 · Cited by 1,217
Biomass and production of large African herbivores in relation to rainfall and primary production
Coe, M. J., Cumming, D. H., & Phillipson, J. (1976) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00345312 · Cited by 630
African Wildlife and Livelihoods: The Promise and Performance of Community Conservation
Glaesel, H., Hulme, D., & Murphree, M. (2002) · Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue Canadienne des Études Africaines · doi:10.2307/4107220 · Cited by 600
Serengeti II: Dynamics, management, and conservation of an ecosystem
Leader-Williams, N. (1996) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(96)81103-7 · Cited by 500
A model of regional primary production for use with coarse resolution satellite data
PRINCE, S. D. (1991) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431169108929728 · Cited by 497
Food regulates the Serengeti wildebeest: a 40-year record.
Mduma, S. A. R., Sinclair, A. R. E., & Hilborn, R. (1999) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00352.x · Cited by 434
Avoiding Disaster: Diversification and Risk Management among East African Herders
Little, P. D., Smith, K., Cellarius, B. A., Coppock, D. L., & Barrett, C. (2001) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/1467-7660.00211 · Cited by 395
Gibson, C. C., & Marks, S. A. (1995) · World Development · doi:10.1016/0305-750x(95)00025-8 · Cited by 379
Rangeland Management and Ecology in East Africa
Skovlin, J., Pratt, D. J., & Gwynne, M. D. (1979) · Journal of Range Management · doi:10.2307/3898030 · Cited by 369
Resource heterogeneity and ungulate population dynamics
Illius, A. W., & O'Connor, T. G. (2000) · Oikos · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890209.x · Cited by 333
Cited by
Savanna woody encroachment is widespread across three continents
Stevens, N., Lehmann, C. E. R., Murphy, B. P., & Durigan, G. (2017) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13409 · Cited by 695
Hayward, M. W., & Kerley, G. I. H. (2009) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.09.022 · Cited by 489
Kolowski, J. M., & Holekamp, K. E. (2006) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.10.021 · Cited by 310
Cross-boundary human impacts compromise the Serengeti-Mara ecosystem
Veldhuis, M. P., Ritchie, M. E., Ogutu, J. O., Morrison, T. A., Beale, C. M., Estes, A. B., Mwakilema, W., Ojwang, G. O., Parr, C. L., Probert, J., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aav0564 · Cited by 265
Pastoral Herd Management, Drought Coping Strategies, and Cattle Mobility in Southern Kenya
Butt, B., Shortridge, A., & WinklerPrins, A. M. G. A. (2009) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1080/00045600802685895 · Cited by 145
Metadata
- Authors
- Lamprey, R. H., & Reid, R. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Biogeography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-05-07
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 997-1032
- ISSN
- 0305-0270 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2699
- OpenAlex
- W1541664464
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 66
- FWCI
- 20.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Expansion of human settlement in Kenya's Maasai Mara: what future for pastoralism and wildlife? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01062.x
- The paper
- Lamprey, R. H., & Reid, R. S. (2004). Expansion of human settlement in Kenya's Maasai Mara: what future for pastoralism and wildlife? Journal of Biogeography. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01062.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.