Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 300

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Consultation with children in hospital: children, parents’ and nurses’ perspectives

Coyne, Imelda·2006·Journal of Clinical Nursing

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To explore children's, parents’ and nurses’ views on participation in care in the healthcare setting. Background. Children have a right to be consulted and involved in their care. Design. The grounded theory method was used and data were collected through in‐depth interviews, questionnaires and observation. Sample consisted of 11 children, 10 parents and 12 nurses from four paediatric wards in two hospitals in England. Results. Parents felt that children should be involved in the decision‐making process thereby enhancing and promoting children's self‐esteem and positive self‐regard, which would consequently enhance their overall welfare. Likewise, children expressed the need for consultation and information so that they could understand their illness; be involved in their care, and prepare themselves for procedures. However, children's own opinions and views were underused and they had varying experiences of being consulted about their care and treatment. Nurses appeared to hold varying and discrepant views on the involvement of children in decisions and for some nurses, the child's involvement seemed to be dependent on the child's cognitive maturity and being defined as a rational subject. Conclusion. Health professionals’ communication behaviour may reflect recognition of children's cognitive abilities rather than their competence to understand. The fact that children's nurses appeared to make decisions about involving children in decision making in the absence of a reliable framework was a significant finding and highlights a real problem in the current climate. Relevance to clinical practice. Nurses faced with workforce pressures may encounter considerable challenges to facilitating children's involvement in decisions about their care. Hence it is imperative that nurses’ examine the basis of their decisions and use more explicit criteria for determining children's involvement.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01247.x

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 58 references

Cited by

See all 300

Metadata

Authors
Coyne, I.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-12-23
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
61-71
ISSN
  • 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2702
OpenAlex
W2054835080
Cited by
300
References
58
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consultation with children in hospital: children, parents’ and nurses’ perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01247.x
The paper
Coyne, I. (2006). Consultation with children in hospital: children, parents’ and nurses’ perspectives. Journal of Clinical Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01247.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.