Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 313

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Life satisfaction among older people (65+) with reduced self‐care capacity: the relationship to social, health and financial aspects

Open access
Borg, Christel, Hallberg, Ingalill R, Blomqvist, Kerstin·2006·Journal of Clinical Nursing

Abstract

Aims and objectives. This study aimed at investigating life satisfaction and its relation to living conditions, overall health, self‐care capacity, feeling lonely, physical activities and financial resources among people (65+) with reduced self‐care capacity. Background. Knowledge about factors related to low life satisfaction among older people with reduced self‐care capacity is sparse, although this is important in health care and nursing so that the care is adapted to their needs and perspective. Previous research has mainly focused on isolated aspects such as pain in relation to life satisfaction among older people in general and less among so those with reduced self‐care capacity in general. Design and method. A subsample of 522 persons was selected from a randomly selected cross‐sectional survey using a modified form of the Older Americans’ Resources Schedule and Life Satisfaction Index Z. Results. The mean age in the total sample was 77·9; women (79·5) were significantly older than men (77·0). Low life satisfaction was found among women, as well as those living in special accommodations. Life Satisfaction Index Z was 15·3 (SD 5·6) in the total sample. Gender and living conditions did not explain life satisfaction whilst poor overall self‐reported health and poor financial resources in relation to needs had the strongest explanatory value. Also of significant importance were loneliness, the degree of reduced self‐care capacity and feeling worried. Conclusion. Life satisfaction in older people with reduced self‐care capacity is determined by several factors, with social, physical, mental and financial aspects probably interacting with each other; especially feeling lonely, degree of self‐care capacity, poor overall health, feeling worried and poor financial resources in relation to needs. These factors need to be considered in the care of these people to preserve or improve their life satisfaction. Relevance to clinical practice. Nursing interventions in terms of preventive home visits, rehabilitation, health education directed towards physical, psychological, social and economic aspects of importance may help to preserve or improve life satisfaction for those with reduced self‐care capacity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01375.x

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Cited by

See all 313

Metadata

Authors
Borg, C., Hallberg, I. R., & Blomqvist, K.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-04-03
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
607-618
ISSN
  • 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2702
OpenAlex
W2138207249
Cited by
313
References
60
FWCI
7.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Life satisfaction among older people (65+) with reduced self‐care capacity: the relationship to social, health and financial aspects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01375.x
The paper
Borg, C., Hallberg, I. R., & Blomqvist, K. (2006). Life satisfaction among older people (65+) with reduced self‐care capacity: the relationship to social, health and financial aspects. Journal of Clinical Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01375.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.