Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Group cognition in computer‐assisted collaborative learning

Stahl, Gerry·2005·Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Abstract

Abstract Recent research on instructional technology has focused increasingly on the potential of computer support to promote collaborative learning. Socio‐cultural theories have been imported from cognate fields to suggest that cognition and learning take place at the level of groups and communities as well as individuals. Various positions on this issue have been proposed and a number of theoretical perspectives have been recommended. In particular, the concept of common ground has been developed to explain how meanings and understandings can be shared by multiple individuals. This paper takes a critical look at the concept of shared meaning as it is generally used and proposes an empirical study of how group cognition is constituted in practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00115.x

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Husserl E., 1936, Edmund Husserl's Origin of Geometry: An Introduction, 157
  2. Kaptelinin V., 2002, CSCL2: Carrying Forward the Conversation, 297
  3. KoschmannT.(2002b)Differing ontologies: eighteenth‐century philosophy and the learning sciences. Paper Presented at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 02) Seattle WA.
  4. Lemke J., 1990, Talking Science
  5. Marx K., 1867, Capital (B. Fowkes, Trans. Vol. I)
  6. Norman D.A., 1993, Things that Make us Smart
  7. Roschelle J., 1996, CSCL: Theory and Practice of an Emerging Paradigm, 209
  8. 10.3102/0013189X027002004 · doi:10.3102/0013189x027002004 · Paper page
  9. Simon H., 1981, The Sciences of the Artificial
  10. Stahl G., 2000, Review of ‘Professional Development for Cooperative Learning, Teaching and Learning in Medicine: An International Journal, 12
  11. Vygotsky L., 1930, Mind in Society

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Stahl, G.
Venue
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-04
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
79-90
ISSN
  • 0266-4909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2729
OpenAlex
W1820991386
Cited by
265
References
62
FWCI
19.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Group cognition in computer‐assisted collaborative learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00115.x
The paper
Stahl, G. (2005). Group cognition in computer‐assisted collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00115.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.