The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Invasion impacts diversity through altered community dynamics
Abstract
Summary: Invading plant species often alter community structure, composition and, in some instances, reduce local diversity. However, the community dynamics underlying these impacts are relatively unknown. Declines in species richness with invasion may occur via displacement of resident species and/or reduction of seedling establishment by the invader. These two mechanisms differ in the demographic stage of the interaction. We document turnover dynamics using long‐term permanent plot data to assess the mechanism(s) of invasion impacts of four exotic species on a mixed community of native and exotic species. These mechanisms were evaluated at both the neighbourhood (1‐m 2 plot) and population (individual species) scales. During invasion, species richness declined with increasing invader cover for three of the four invaders. All invaders reduced colonization rates, but had no effect on extinction rates at the neighbourhood scale. Populations differed in their susceptibility to invasion impacts, with significant reductions in colonization for 10 of 25 (40%) species and increases in extinction for only 4 of 29 (14%) species. At neighbourhood and population scales, influences of invasion on community dynamics were essentially the same for all invaders regardless of life‐form. While individual resident species had some increase in extinction probability, community richness impacts were largely driven by colonization limitation. The consistency of invasion impacts across life‐forms suggests establishment limitation as a general mechanism of invasion impact. This common causal mechanism should be explored in other systems to determine the extent of its generality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Positive Interactions of Nonindigenous Species: Invasional Meltdown?
Simberloff, D., & Von Holle, B. (1999) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1023/a:1010086329619 · Cited by 2,231
Cited by
What's new about old fields? Land abandonment and ecosystem assembly
CRAMER, V, HOBBS, R., & STANDISH, R. (2008) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.005 · Cited by 890
Alien plant invasions and native plant extinctions: a six-threshold framework
Downey, P. O., & Richardson, D. M. (2016) · AoB PLANTS · doi:10.1093/aobpla/plw047 · Cited by 159
Wilsey, B. J., Daneshgar, P. P., & Polley, H. W. (2011) · Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1016/j.ppees.2011.07.002 · Cited by 99
Bellingham, P. J., Kardol, P., Bonner, K. I., Buxton, R. P., Morse, C. W., & Wardle, D. A. (2016) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12624 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- YURKONIS, K. A., MEINERS, S. J., & WACHHOLDER, B. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-06-13
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1053-1061
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2745
- OpenAlex
- W1694995535
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Invasion impacts diversity through altered community dynamics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01029.x
- The paper
- YURKONIS, K. A., MEINERS, S. J., & WACHHOLDER, B. E. (2005). Invasion impacts diversity through altered community dynamics. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01029.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.