The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differences in plasticity between invasive and native plants from a low resource environment
Abstract
1 Phenotypic plasticity is often cited as an important mechanism of plant invasion. However, few studies have evaluated the plasticity of a diverse set of traits among invasive and native species, particularly in low resource habitats, and none have examined the functional significance of these traits. 2 I explored trait plasticity in response to variation in light and nutrient availability in five phylogenetically related pairs of native and invasive species occurring in a nutrient-poor habitat. In addition to the magnitude of trait plasticity, I assessed the correlation between 16 leaf- and plant-level traits and plant performance, as measured by total plant biomass. Because plasticity for morphological and physiological traits is thought to be limited in low resource environments (where native species usually display traits associated with resource conservation), I predicted that native and invasive species would display similar, low levels of trait plasticity. 3 Across treatments, invasive and native species within pairs differed with respect to many of the traits measured; however, invasive species as a group did not show consistent patterns in the direction of trait values. Relative to native species, invasive species displayed high plasticity in traits pertaining to biomass partitioning and leaf-level nitrogen and light use, but only in response to nutrient availability. Invasive and native species showed similar levels of resource-use efficiency and there was no relationship between species plasticity and resource-use efficiency across species. 4 Traits associated with carbon fixation were strongly correlated with performance in invasive species while only a single resource conservation trait was strongly correlated with performance in multiple native species. Several highly plastic traits were not strongly correlated with performance which underscores the difficulty in assessing the functional significance of resource conservation traits over short timescales and calls into question the relevance of simple, quantitative assessments of trait plasticity. 5 Synthesis. My data support the idea that invasive species display high trait plasticity. The degree of plasticity observed here for species occurring in low resource systems corresponds with values observed in high resource systems, which contradicts the general paradigm that trait plasticity is constrained in low resource systems. Several traits were positively correlated with plant performance suggesting that trait plasticity will influence plant fitness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species
Farquhar, G. D., von Caemmerer, S., & Berry, J. A. (1980) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00386231 · Cited by 8,796
Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies
Moran, M. D. (2003) · Oikos · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12010.x · Cited by 1,484 · cited 2×
“Following Moran (2003), sequential Bonferroni corrections for multiple statistical tests were not conducted.”
MethodReconciling plant strategy theories of Grime and Tilman
CRAINE, J. M. (2005) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01043.x · Cited by 634
Cited by
Davidson, A. M., Jennions, M., & Nicotra, A. B. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01596.x · Cited by 1,289
Plant Phenotypic Plasticity in Response to Environmental Factors
Gratani, L. (2014) · Advances in Botany · doi:10.1155/2014/208747 · Cited by 665
Plants and climate change: complexities and surprises
Parmesan, C., & Hanley, M. E. (2015) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcv169 · Cited by 620
What we still don't know about invasion genetics
Bock, D. G., Caseys, C., Cousens, R. D., Hahn, M. A., Heredia, S. M., Hübner, S., Turner, K. G., Whitney, K. D., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2015) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.13032 · Cited by 441
Resource competition in plant invasions: emerging patterns and research needs
Gioria, M., & Osborne, B. A. (2014) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00501 · Cited by 437
Metadata
- Authors
- Funk, J. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-10-15
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1162-1173
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2745
- OpenAlex
- W2024733582
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differences in plasticity between invasive and native plants from a low resource environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01435.x
- The paper
- Funk, J. L. (2008). Differences in plasticity between invasive and native plants from a low resource environment. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01435.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.