Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 237

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional traits of alien plants across contrasting climatic and land‐use regimes: do aliens join the locals or try harder than them?

Tecco, Paula A., Díaz, Sandra, Cabido, Marcelo, Urcelay, Carlos·2010·Journal of Ecology

Abstract

Summary: 1 Two main views have been put forward to explain whether coexisting alien and resident plant species should show converging or diverging functional attributes. According to the ‘try‐harder’ hypothesis, successful aliens should differ from resident species with traits that allow them to deal better with the local conditions than resident species. On the other hand, the ‘join‐the‐locals’ hypothesis stresses the importance of filtering by environmental factors and predicts strong functional trait similarities between alien and native species, especially among the dominants. 2 On the basis of a functional trait comparison between native and alien species of central‐western Argentina across five contrasting ecosystems and four land‐use regimes, we tested these hypotheses over a broad range of habitats. We built a data set with common measurement methods and biogeographical factors but strongly varying environmental conditions, ranging from mesic to extremely dry, and from nearly pristine to heavily disturbed. 3 When considering all species together, the main trend of variation in trait syndromes was between acquisitive (tender, large leaves, with high specific area) and conservative (tough, small leaves, with low specific area and low nutrient content). Although both native and alien species appeared to be well spread across the whole range of trait variation, woody alien species showed a significantly more acquisitive set of attributes (higher specific leaf area, larger and thinner leaves, lower wood density) than native species. No significant difference was detected between herbaceous alien and native species. These general trends were maintained under contrasting climatic and land‐use conditions. 4 Synthesis. The patterns detected for herbaceous species were in line with the ‘join‐the‐locals’ hypothesis. In contrast, those found for woody species, with woody alien species showing more acquisitive attributes than native species in more resource‐rich habitats, provide partial support for the ‘try‐harder’ hypothesis. Overall, our findings reinforce the idea that a universal suit of attributes is unlikely to explain alien plant distribution. They also stress the need for caution when mixing major life‐forms in comparative plant trait analysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01592.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 237

Metadata

Authors
Tecco, P. A., Díaz, S., Cabido, M., & Urcelay, C.
Venue
Journal of Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-12-11
Volume
98
Issue
1
Pages
17-27
ISSN
  • 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2745
OpenAlex
W1510672669
Cited by
237
References
5
FWCI
9.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional traits of alien plants across contrasting climatic and land‐use regimes: do aliens join the locals or try harder than them? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01592.x
The paper
Tecco, P. A., Díaz, S., Cabido, M., & Urcelay, C. (2010). Functional traits of alien plants across contrasting climatic and land‐use regimes: do aliens join the locals or try harder than them? Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01592.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.