Comparison of energy and protein intakes of older people consuming a texture modified diet with a normal hospital diet
Abstract
Background There are very few studies looking at the energy and protein requirements of patients requiring texture modified diets. Dysphagia is the main indication for people to be recommended texture-modified diets. Older people post-stroke are the key group in the hospital setting who consume this type of diet. The diets can be of several consistencies ranging from pureed to soft textures. Objective To compare the 24-hour dietary intake of older people consuming a texture modified diet in a clinical setting to older people consuming a normal hospital diet. Method Weighed food intakes and food record charts were used to quantify the patients' intakes, which were compared to their individual requirements. Results The oral intake of 55 patients was measured. Twenty-five of the patients surveyed were eating a normal diet and acted as controls for 30 patients who were prescribed a texture-modified diet. The results showed that the texture-modified group had significantly lower intakes of energy (3877 versus 6115 kJ, P Conclusion These statistically significant results indicate that older people on texture-modified diets have a lower intake of energy and protein than those consuming a normal hospital diet and it is likely that other nutrients will be inadequate. All patients on texture-modified diets should be assessed by the dietitian for nutritional support. Evidence based strategies for improving overall nutrient intake should be identified.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Insufficient dietary intake is described in older persons with dysphagia receiving texture-modified diets.
“Nevertheless, insufficient dietary intake is described in older persons with dysphagia receiving texture-modified diets (20)(21)(22)107).”
From ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics (2022) · cites this paper as [21]
Restrictive diets in older persons are associated with potential risks in terms of malnutrition, quality of life, morbidity, and mortality.
“Restrictive diets must be avoided for older persons regarding potential 1697 risks in terms of malnutrition, quality of life, morbidity, and mortality [228, 229].”
From ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [229]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 22 · Cited by 273
- Authors
- Wright, L., Cotter, D., Hickson, M., & Frost, G.
- Affiliations
- Hammersmith Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Wright, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-05-09
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 213-219
- ISSN
- 0952-3871 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-277X
- OpenAlex
- W2071134335
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 21.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Keywords
- texture-modified diets, dysphagia, older adults, stroke survivors, energy intake, protein intake, nutrient requirements, negative energy balance, protein deficiency, hospital food, nutritional support
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Energy Intake, Deglutition Disorders, Dietary Proteins, Female, Food Service, Hospital, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutritional Requirements, Geriatric Assessment, Nutrition Assessment, Diet Records, Case-Control Studies, Evidence-Based Medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review