Cited by 46Ovarian function and disordersDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiet, Metabolism, and Disease

An retrospective audit of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: the effects of a reduced glycaemic load diet

Herriot, A. M., Whitcroft, S., Jeanes, Y.·2008·Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics

Abstract

Background Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is characterized by hyperandrogenism and chronic anovulation. The aim of this retrospective audit was to determine the patient profile, including anthropometrics, biochemistry and symptoms, and to evaluate the influence of a dietary intervention in women with PCOS. Methods Data were collected retrospectively from dietetic and medical records from all PCOS patients (n = 88) who attended a dietetic consultation from July 2004 to July 2006. As standard clinic practice, a reduced glycaemic load diet had been prescribed, with energy reduction in overweight patients. Follow‐up data were available for 59 patients. Results Fifty‐eight patients had a body mass index (BMI) ≤ 24.9 kg m−2 and 30 had a BMI ≥ 25 kg m−2. Thirty‐six patients, with a BMI ≤ 24.9 kg m−2, self‐reported central weight gain at their initial appointment. Over two‐thirds of patients self‐reported one or more of the following symptoms: carbohydrate cravings, hypoglycaemia, tiredness and hunger. At the follow‐up appointment, BMI and waist circumference significantly decreased in overweight patients (P < 0.05). Seventy‐one percent of women self‐reported hypoglycaemia initially; this was reduced to 13% at follow‐up (P < 0.01). Conclusions The audit indicated a low glycaemic load diet in combination with medication may contribute to an improvement in symptom relief in patients with PCOS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-277x.2008.00890.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herriot, A. M., Whitcroft, S., & Jeanes, Y.
Affiliations
University of Roehampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Herriot, A. M.
Venue
Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-07-15
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
337-345
ISSN
  • 0952-3871 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-277X
OpenAlex
W2023813084
Cited by
46
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, dietary intervention, hypoglycemia, carbohydrate craving, overweight, body mass index, waist circumference, hyperandrogenism, anovulation, symptom relief
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Diet, Reducing, Dietary Carbohydrates, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Insulin, Obesity, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Retrospective Studies, Body Mass Index, Treatment Outcome, Glycemic Index, Waist-Hip Ratio, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review