Cited by 132Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentInclusion and Disability in Education and Sport

Measurements of neuromuscular tone and strength in down’s syndrome children.

Morris, A. F., Vaughan, Susan E., Vaccaro, P.·1982·Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

Abstract

Twenty-eight Down's syndrome children and 22 normal children were evaluated for patellar tendon reflex, muscle tone and grip strength. All of this subjects were between the ages of 4 and 17 years. It was the purpose of this study to determine the differences between Down's syndrome and normal children. The standard patellar reflex test was used for one measure of muscle tone, and a locally devised muscle palpation test for the second measure of muscle tone. Finally, grip strength was employed as our measure of muscle strength. Results indicated that Down's syndrome children had a less brisk and more irregular patellar reflex response than normal controls. Furthermore, overall muscular tone was less in these Down's syndrome subjects and finally, muscular grip strength was inferior in Down's syndrome children when compared to normal children. Implications for increased physical education and physical activity are noted for this special population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2788.1982.tb00127.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Motor deficits are present at birth in Down syndrome, indicating that changes in cellular circuitry of the spinal cord likely precede adulthood.

    “However, motor deficits are present at birth indicating that changes in cellular circuitry of the spinal cord likely precede adulthood.”

    From Neurodevelopment in Down syndrome: Concordance in humans and models (2022) · cites this paper as Morris et al., 1982

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morris, A. F., Vaughan, S. E., & Vaccaro, P.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Morris, A. F.
Venue
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1982-03
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
41-46
ISSN
  • 0964-2633 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2788
OpenAlex
W2088826677
Cited by
132
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Intellectual Disability Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Keywords
Down syndrome, muscle strength, patellar reflex, grip strength, muscle tone assessment, muscle palpation, children, physical education, physical activity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Down Syndrome, Female, Humans, Male, Muscle Tonus, Muscles, Reflex, Stretch

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review