Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 310

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 151 of the 151 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Autism spectrum disorders in genetic syndromes: implications for diagnosis, intervention and understanding the wider autism spectrum disorder population

Open access
Moss, J., Howlin, P.·2009·Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

Abstract

Background An emerging literature on behavioural phenotypes has highlighted apparent associations between autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) or ASD‐related phenomenology and a number of different genetically determined syndromes. Method A systematic review of the current literature regarding the association with ASD and ASD characteristics was conducted in the following syndrome groups: Fragile X, Rett, Tuberous Sclerosis Complex, Down, Angelman, CHARGE and Phenylketonuria. Specific consideration was given to the role of intellectual disability in assessing the association between ASD and these syndrome groups. Results The review highlights that while formal diagnostic assessments may indicate an association between ASD and specific syndrome groups, detailed investigation has revealed subtle but qualitative differences in the presentation of ASD‐like phenomenology in particular syndrome groups. The degree of ID of the individual clearly has a role to play with regard to the development and presentation of ASD‐like characteristics, and caution should be taken when assessing ASD symptomatology in genetically determined syndromes associated with severe ID. However, degree of ID cannot solely account for the heightened prevalence of ASD characteristics in some specific syndrome groups. Conclusions There is a need for caution in interpreting the significance of superficial similarities between ASD and the behavioural phenotypes of certain genetically determined syndromes. However, recognition of ASD‐like characteristics (even where a true diagnosis of ASD may not be relevant) in individuals with genetic syndromes is crucial in ensuring that individuals receive appropriate behavioural management and educational placement. Further research in this field requires fine‐grained investigation of behavioural phenomenology within individual syndrome groups.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01197.x

Cites

151 of 151 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 151 references

Cited by

See all 310

Metadata

Authors
Moss, J., & Howlin, P.
Venue
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-09-25
Volume
53
Issue
10
Pages
852-873
ISSN
  • 0964-2633 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2788
OpenAlex
W1968922308
Cited by
310
References
151
FWCI
8.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Autism spectrum disorders in genetic syndromes: implications for diagnosis, intervention and understanding the wider autism spectrum disorder population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01197.x
The paper
Moss, J., & Howlin, P. (2009). Autism spectrum disorders in genetic syndromes: implications for diagnosis, intervention and understanding the wider autism spectrum disorder population. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01197.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.