Cited by 124Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsAortic Thrombus and EmbolismGastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment

Fatal nonocclusive mesenteric ischaemia: population‐based incidence and risk factors

Open access
ACOSTA, S., ÖGREN, M., STERNBY, N.‐H., BERGQVIST, D., BJÖRCK, M.·2006·Journal of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Abstract.: Objectives. To estimate the incidence and extension of visceral organ infarction, and to evaluate potential causes, in patients with autopsy‐verified nonocclusive mesenteric ischaemia (NOMI) and transmural intestinal infarction. Setting. In Malmö, Sweden, the autopsy rate between 1970 and 1982 was 87%, creating possibilities for a population‐based study. Design. Amongst 23 446 clinical autopsies, 997 cases were coded for intestinal ischaemia in a database. In addition, 7569 forensic autopsy protocols were analysed. In a nested case–control study within the clinical autopsy cohort, four NOMI‐free controls, matched for gender, age at death and year of death, were identified for each fatal NOMI case to evaluate risk factors. Results. The overall incidence of autopsy‐verified fatal NOMI was 2.0/100 000 person‐years, increasing with age up to 40/100 000 person‐years in octogenarians. Patients with stenosis of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA; n = 25) were older ( P = 0.002) than those without ( n = 37), and had more often a concomitant stenosis of the coeliac trunk ( P < 0.001). Synchronous infarction in the liver, spleen or kidney occurred in one‐fifth of all patients. Fatal cardiac failure [OR 2.9 (1.7–5.2)], history of atrial fibrillation [OR 2.2 (1.2–4.0)] and recent surgery [OR 3.4 (1.6–6.9)] were risk factors for fatal NOMI. Conclusions. Fatal heart failure was the leading cause of intestinal hypoperfusion, although stenosis of the SMA and coeliac trunk, atrial fibrillation and recent surgery contributed significantly. Collaboration across specialties seems to be of utmost importance to improve the prognosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2006.01613.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 36 · Cited by 124

Authors
ACOSTA, S., ÖGREN, M., STERNBY, N. ‐., BERGQVIST, D., & BJÖRCK, M.
Affiliations
  • Skåne University Hospital (SE)
  • Uppsala University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
ACOSTA, S.
Venue
Journal of Internal Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-01-31
Volume
259
Issue
3
Pages
305-313
ISSN
  • 0954-6820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2796
OpenAlex
W2068216869
Cited by
124
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Aortic Thrombus and Embolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
intestinal infarction, incidence, risk factors, superior mesenteric artery stenosis, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, recent surgery, autopsy findings, intestinal hypoperfusion
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Infarction, Intestines, Ischemia, Male, Mesenteric Vascular Occlusion, Mesentery, Middle Aged, Sweden, Mesenteric Artery, Superior, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review