Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,844

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The quantitative analysis of thin specimens

Cliff, G., Lorimer, G. W.·1975·Journal of Microscopy

Abstract

SUMMARY: Results are reported concerning the use of an energy dispersive X‐ray detector to carry out the analysis of thin foils in the electron microscope. The combination of a thin specimen and the extreme stability of the energy dispersive X‐ray detector enables the experimental determination of a calibration curve of X‐ray production—detection efficiency vs characteristic X‐ray energy. Quantitative analysis can be carried out using the calibration curve without reference to standards at the time of analysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1975.tb03895.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,844

Metadata

Authors
Cliff, G., & Lorimer, G. W.
Venue
Journal of Microscopy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1975-03
Volume
103
Issue
2
Pages
203-207
ISSN
  • 0022-2720 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2818
OpenAlex
W2103268779
Cited by
1,844
References
0
FWCI
6.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The quantitative analysis of thin specimens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1975.tb03895.x
The paper
Cliff, G., & Lorimer, G. W. (1975). The quantitative analysis of thin specimens. Journal of Microscopy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1975.tb03895.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.