The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cryo‐fluorescence microscopy facilitates correlations between light and cryo‐electron microscopy and reduces the rate of photobleaching
Abstract
Summary: Fluorescence light microscopy (LM) has many advantages for the study of cell organization. Specimen preparation is easy and relatively inexpensive, and the use of appropriate tags gives scientists the ability to visualize specific proteins of interest. LM is, however, limited in resolution, so when one is interested in ultrastructure, one must turn to electron microscopy (EM), even though this method presents problems of its own. The biggest difficulty with cellular EM is its limited utility in localizing macromolecules of interest while retaining good structural preservation. We have built a cryo‐light microscope stage that allows us to generate LM images of vitreous samples prepared for cryo‐EM. Correlative LM and EM allows one to find areas of particular interest by using fluorescent proteins or vital dyes as markers within vitrified samples. Once located, the sample can be placed in the EM for further study at higher resolution. An additional benefit of the cryo‐LM stage is that photobleaching is slower at cryogenic temperatures (−140°C) than at room temperature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Correlated light and electron microscopy: ultrastructure lights up!
de Boer, P., Hoogenboom, J. P., & Giepmans, B. N. G. (2015) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3400 · Cited by 526
Site-specific cryo-focused ion beam sample preparation guided by 3D correlative microscopy
Arnold, J., Mahamid, J., Lucic, V., de Marco, A., Fernandez, J.-J., Laugks, T., Mayer, T., Hyman, A. A., Baumeister, W., & Plitzko, J. M. (2016) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2015.10.053 · Cited by 221
Schorb, M., & Briggs, J. A. G. (2014) · Ultramicroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.10.015 · Cited by 140
Duke, E. M. H., Razi, M., Weston, A., Guttmann, P., Werner, S., Henzler, K., Schneider, G., Tooze, S. A., & Collinson, L. M. (2014) · Ultramicroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.10.006 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- SCHWARTZ, C. L., SARBASH, V. I., ATAULLAKHANOV, F. I., MCINTOSH, J. R., & NICASTRO, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Microscopy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 227
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 98-109
- ISSN
- 0022-2720 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2818
- OpenAlex
- W1989521332
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cryo‐fluorescence microscopy facilitates correlations between light and cryo‐electron microscopy and reduces the rate of photobleaching. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2007.01794.x
- The paper
- SCHWARTZ, C. L., SARBASH, V. I., ATAULLAKHANOV, F. I., MCINTOSH, J. R., & NICASTRO, D. (2007). Cryo‐fluorescence microscopy facilitates correlations between light and cryo‐electron microscopy and reduces the rate of photobleaching. Journal of Microscopy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2007.01794.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.