Cited by 38Geriatric Care and Nursing HomesTechnology Use by Older AdultsSocial Policies and Healthcare Reform

Staff members’ perceptions of a ICT support package in dementia care during the process of implementation

Open access
ENGSTRÖM, MARIA, LINDQVIST, RAGNY, LJUNGGREN, BIRGITTA, CARLSSON, MARIANNE·2009·Journal of Nursing Management

Abstract

AIM: The aim of the present study was to describe staff members' perceptions of an information and communication technology (ICT) support package during the process of implementation. BACKGROUND: ICT in dementia care will likely increase in the future. The diffusion of new innovations can be better understood through diffusion research. METHODS: Fourteen staff members in dementia care were interviewed, in groups, once before the new ICT, twice during its implementation and once after. Data were analysed using qualitative content analyses. The ICT included monitors/alarms: passage alarms, fall detectors, sensor-activated night-time illumination of the lavatory, and communication technology: Internet communication and additional computers. RESULTS: The results showed two themes 'Moving from fear of losing control to perceived increase in control and security' and 'Struggling with insufficient/deficient systems'. CONCLUSIONS: Staff perceptions of ICT were diverse and changed during the implementation. Benefits were more pronounced than disadvantages, and improvements were described both in care and in staff job situation. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Functioning and use of ICT may relate to design as well as by application and the surrounding structure, and the whole system: the organizational structure, the employers and the new product needs to be taken into consideration when implementing new technology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2009.00985.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ENGSTRÖM, M., LINDQVIST, R., LJUNGGREN, B., & CARLSSON, M.
Affiliations
Uppsala University (SE)
Venue
Journal of Nursing Management
Published
2009-11
Volume
17
Issue
7
Pages
781-789
ISSN
  • 0966-0429 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2834
OpenAlex
W2028225419
Cited by
38
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nursing Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Social Policies and Healthcare Reform
Keywords
information and communication technologies, dementia care, employee perceptions, technology implementation, diffusion of innovations, night-time illumination, online communication, organizational structure, nursing management
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Dementia, Diffusion of Innovation, Female, Hospital Information Systems, Humans, Middle Aged, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Social Perception, Sweden, Access to Information, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review