Staff members’ perceptions of a ICT support package in dementia care during the process of implementation
Open accessAbstract
AIM: The aim of the present study was to describe staff members' perceptions of an information and communication technology (ICT) support package during the process of implementation. BACKGROUND: ICT in dementia care will likely increase in the future. The diffusion of new innovations can be better understood through diffusion research. METHODS: Fourteen staff members in dementia care were interviewed, in groups, once before the new ICT, twice during its implementation and once after. Data were analysed using qualitative content analyses. The ICT included monitors/alarms: passage alarms, fall detectors, sensor-activated night-time illumination of the lavatory, and communication technology: Internet communication and additional computers. RESULTS: The results showed two themes 'Moving from fear of losing control to perceived increase in control and security' and 'Struggling with insufficient/deficient systems'. CONCLUSIONS: Staff perceptions of ICT were diverse and changed during the implementation. Benefits were more pronounced than disadvantages, and improvements were described both in care and in staff job situation. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Functioning and use of ICT may relate to design as well as by application and the surrounding structure, and the whole system: the organizational structure, the employers and the new product needs to be taken into consideration when implementing new technology.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Twelve studies presented results on IAT that were both accepted and used by the participants.
“Twelve studies presented results on IAT that were both accepted and used by the participants [19–21, 23, 27, 30–33, 42, 43, 45].”
From Acceptance and use of innovative assistive technologies among people with cognitive impairment and their caregivers: a systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as [23]
One reviewed study describes how the struggle with imperfect systems might end up in success when the participants shifted their attitude from fear of losing control to perceived increase in control.
“In this respect, one of the reviewed studies [23] describes how the struggle with imperfect systems might end up in a success when the participants felt their attitude from fear of losing control to perceived increase in control.”
From Acceptance and use of innovative assistive technologies among people with cognitive impairment and their caregivers: a systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as [23]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach
Berg, M. (1999) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/s1386-5056(99)00011-8 · Cited by 786 · see citing works
Electronic tracking of patients with dementia and wandering using mobile phone technology
Miskelly, F. (2005) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afi145 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thordardottir, B., Malmgren Fänge, A., Lethin, C., Rodriguez Gatta, D., & Chiatti, C. (2019) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2019/9196729 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Hall, A., Brown Wilson, C., Stanmore, E., & Todd, C. (2019) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-019-1155-6 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
- Authors
- ENGSTRÖM, M., LINDQVIST, R., LJUNGGREN, B., & CARLSSON, M.
- Affiliations
- Uppsala University (SE)
- ORCID
- ENGSTRÖM, MARIA
- Venue
- Journal of Nursing Management
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 781-789
- ISSN
- 0966-0429 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2834
- OpenAlex
- W2028225419
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Nursing Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Social Policies and Healthcare Reform
- Keywords
- information and communication technologies, dementia care, employee perceptions, technology implementation, diffusion of innovations, night-time illumination, online communication, organizational structure, nursing management
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Dementia, Diffusion of Innovation, Female, Hospital Information Systems, Humans, Middle Aged, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Social Perception, Sweden, Access to Information, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review